In this insightful conversation, Steve Teles, a Political Science professor at Johns Hopkins University, delves into the profound impact of minoritarianism on American democracy. He discusses how small groups can disproportionately influence governance, often at the expense of majority desires. Teles critiques institutional mechanisms like the Electoral College and filibuster that favor minority interests, while also exploring challenges in environmental policymaking. His call for reforms and embracing ideological diversity highlights urgency in enhancing democratic representation.
The U.S. Constitution was primarily designed to prevent majority tyranny, but it now faces challenges from the dominance of minoritarian interest groups.
Local governance often amplifies minoritarian influence due to low voter participation and the apathy of the general population towards elections.
Proposed solutions such as liberal populism and plural professionalism aim to enhance civil engagement and diversify perspectives in governance.
Deep dives
Understanding the Founders' Fears
The Founding Fathers of the United States primarily feared the tyranny of the majority, having drawn lessons from history about how republics could collapse due to homogeneity. They believed that a diverse society would be stronger, as it would ensure that no single interest could dominate others. The founders designed a bicameral legislature and included mechanisms like staggered six-year Senate terms to provide stability against the fluctuating tides of public opinion. This approach emphasized the importance of deliberation, enabling different voices to argue and reason through governance.
Rise of Minoritarian Influence
The current political climate exhibits a significant shift toward the influence of minoritarian interest groups, often overshadowing broader public sentiment. Various organized factions, such as police unions and homeowners associations, can wield disproportionate power in local governance, leading to decision-making that does not reflect the majority's preferences. This phenomenon challenges the very basis of a truly democratic system where the attention of the majority is frequently diverted, allowing smaller, well-organized groups to exert their influence. As these minoritarian preferences manifest in policy, they raise questions about the principles of democracy itself.
The Complexity of Governance
Modern governance operates on a scale substantially larger than what the Founders anticipated, complicating the ability to manage and reverse government actions effectively. The systems established to prevent tyranny and foster deliberation may inadvertently become obstacles when attempting to address issues created by expansive government structures. Economists have pointed out that active attention from only a small, concentrated group can end up dominating the governmental process, making it difficult for broader public opinions to gain traction. Thus, the structural design of government creates a tension that often favors obstruction over creation.
Local Government and Democratic Engagement
Local governance serves as a fertile ground for minoritarianism due to low voter participation and lack of competitive political dynamics. In many jurisdictions, a small fraction of eligible voters actively engages in elections, allowing organized interests to influence outcomes while the general population remains apathetic. This limited engagement not only diminishes the voice of the majority but also enables special interest groups to assert their preferences over public needs, such as housing for marginalized communities. As indicated by low turnout rates, many individuals feel disconnected from local political processes, further entrenching minoritarian influence.
Proposed Solutions to Minimize Minoritarianism
Two potential solutions to counteract the prevalence of minoritarianism include liberal populism and plural professionalism. Liberal populism advocates for a more direct form of governance where critical actions can be taken without deferring excessively to expert opinion, thereby promoting civil engagement and responsiveness. On the other hand, plural professionalism aims to diversify the expert class within governance to include a range of ideological perspectives, enhancing deliberation and decision-making quality. These approaches seek to create a government that better represents the majority while recognizing the complexities and nuances of policy-making and democratic governance.
The Framers of the U.S. Constitution designed a government that they hoped would be impervious to tyranny of the majority. What they didn’t spend much time worrying about was the reverse: a tyranny of the minority. The political scientist Steve Teles explains how very small minorities have come to dominate government and what should be done about it.
Get more from your favorite Atlantic voices when you subscribe. You’ll enjoy unlimited access to Pulitzer-winning journalism, from clear-eyed analysis and insight on breaking news to fascinating explorations of our world. Subscribe today at TheAtlantic.com/podsub.
