Sovereignty Is an Illusion, Not a Fortress

Modern political thought is built on solid ground—on maps with clear borders, on laws tied to territory, on the very idea of a nation-state as a fixed entity. But what if this is a grand illusion? What if the true nature of power is not terrestrial and stable, but fluid, borderless, and chaotic, like the open sea? This was the chilling prophecy of Carl Schmitt, the controversial German jurist who argued that our land-based understanding of sovereignty is fundamentally obsolete in a world dominated by maritime forces. His work serves as a stark warning: in a globalized age, the state that believes it stands on firm ground is, in reality, adrift in a world governed by the unforgiving logic of the ocean, where traditional concepts of authority dissolve into the currents of trade, conflict, and ecological crisis.

This Substack is reader-supported. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Background: The Mind of a Controversial Thinker

Carl Schmitt (1888-1985) was a German jurist and political theorist whose work has significantly influenced both conservative and progressive political thought in the 20th century. Born in a time of political upheaval, Schmitt’s intellectual journey traversed the turbulent waters of the Weimar Republic and the rise of National Socialism. He initially emerged as a prominent critic of Weimar democracy, opposing its parliamentary system and advocating for a more authoritarian political order.

Early Life and Education

Schmitt demonstrated remarkable academic prowess during his studies at Berlin, Munich, and Strasbourg universities. By the age of 22, he had already completed his doctoral dissertation, showcasing his early commitment to political theory and jurisprudence. His intellectual development was marked by a profound engagement with concepts such as sovereignty, authority, and the nature of political conflict.

To hear more, visit www.philosopheasy.com