If We Can’t Impose a Moral Standard from One Period of Time on Another, How Does That Affect the Moral Argument?
Jan 29, 2024
auto_awesome
Topics discussed include the moral argument and imposing moral standards from one period of time on another. They also explore the dilemma of following a God who killed his own son. Other topics touch on objective morality, societal standards, the evolution of moral values, and the significance of religious symbols and practices.
The moral argument for God's existence is based on the idea that objective morality exists within specific contexts, rather than applying universally.
The death of Jesus is seen as a sacrificial act of love and grace, where God sacrifices himself in human form to save humanity.
Deep dives
The Moral Argument for God's Existence
The moral argument for God's existence is based on the idea that if there is no God, there can be no objective morality. It is argued that objective morality does exist, as evidenced by the universal understanding of the problem of evil. The conclusion drawn is that the existence of objective morality implies the existence of God.
Objective Morality and Changing Moral Standards
Objective morality does not mean that there is one set of moral rules that apply universally, regardless of circumstances. Rather, objective morality means that there are moral principles that are objectively true within specific contexts. An action can be objectively morally wrong in one scenario while being objectively morally right in another. Objective morality is not relativism, but an acknowledgment that moral obligations depend on the particular circumstances.
Understanding the Death of Jesus and God's Plan
The death of Jesus is seen as part of a divine plan to rescue humankind from sin and the corruption of the world. It is a sacrificial act where Jesus willingly offers himself to save others, just as soldiers sacrifice themselves to rescue fellow soldiers. The death of Jesus is not characterized as God killing his own son, but rather as God sacrificing himself in human form to bring about the restoration of the world and defeat the problem of evil. It is considered the ultimate act of love and grace, demonstrating God's willingness to save humanity.
Questions about how one can use the moral argument and also say we can’t impose a moral standard from one period of time on another and responding to someone who says she would never follow a God who killed his own son.
If you say we can’t impose a moral standard from one period of time on another, then how does the moral argument fit into this way of thinking?
How would you respond to someone who says she would never follow a God who killed his own son?
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode