Trump's Terms Consider This: Who made the most compelling case to jurors in Trump's trial?
May 28, 2024
Fordham law professor Adam Shlahet discusses the prosecution and defense's tactics in Trump's trial, the impact of closing arguments on the jury's decision, and the potential verdict timeline.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Defense Strategies
- Trump's defense had two possible closing argument strategies: a precise, strategic approach, or a "scorched earth" tactic.
- The defense used a mix of both, focusing on Michael Cohen's credibility while attacking the prosecution's overall narrative.
Defense Narrative
- Trump's defense lacked a strong narrative, relying on claims that Trump didn't understand the documents or that the payments were legal expenses.
- The prosecution presented a more compelling story, making the defense's arguments less persuasive.
Blanche's Improper Remark
- Trump's lawyer, Todd Blanche, asked the judge not to send Trump to prison, which is unusual in closing arguments.
- This was improper because it asks the jury to consider the sentence, not just the facts of the case.