Jimmy Akin, an apologist and author, discusses the doubts surrounding the inclusion of deuterocanonical books in the Bible. He explores the inclusion of other doubted books in the canon and the divinely guided historical process of recognizing Scripture.
The principle of omitting doubted books based on caution is flawed as it would lead to the removal of several books from the Old Testament, including Esther, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Solomon, and Ezekiel.
Omitting a doubted book is not erring on the side of caution but involves a risk, as it could lead to subtracting from the Word of God, while including it risks adding to it, and the decision of the books in the Bible is guided by the Holy Spirit.
Deep dives
Faulty premise of omitting doubted books
The challenge of omitting the Deuterocanonical books based on doubt is flawed. Not only were the Deuterocanonicals doubted, but there were also additional books disputed in the Pharisee tradition. The principle of omission would result in the removal of books like Esther, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Solomon, and Ezekiel. Additionally, some Jewish authorities, such as the Sadducees, disputed the other Prodonautical books, which could lead to the truncation of the Old Testament to just the first five books. The faulty premise also extends to the New Testament, where books like James, 2 Peter, 2 John, Jude, and potentially Revelation were also disputed.
Faulty principle and divine guidance
Besides its flawed nature, the principle of omitting doubted books is faulty. Omitting a doubted book is not erring on the side of caution but inherently involves a risk. Including a doubtful book risks adding to the Word of God, while excluding it risks subtracting from it. The book of Revelation warns against adding to or subtracting from its words, which can be extended to the entire canon. Moreover, the principle fails because it overlooks the role of the Holy Spirit in guiding the Church. Jesus promised the Holy Spirit would lead us into all truth, and the Spirit has guided the Church to recognize the books in the canon. The decision of which books belong in the Bible is not individual but a divinely guided historical process.
1.
Omitting Doubt It Books: A Discussion on Including the Deuterocanonical Books in the Bible
DAY 314
CHALLENGE
“If the deuterocanonical books were doubted by some early on, shouldn’t we err on the side of caution and omit them rather than risk adding to the word of God?”
DEFENSE
This is based on a faulty premise that would lead to dramatic consequences.
First, the deuterocanonicals weren’t the only doubted books of the Old Testament. At least five additional books were disputed in the Pharisee tradition but later included in the canon of modern rabbinic Judaism (see Day 255). These books—Esther, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Solomon, and Ezekiel—are sometimes referred to as…
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode