EP26: Should We Defer To Marginalized Perspectives? (On Tilton and Toole’s Epistemology of Deference)

In this episode, we delve into Emily Tilton and Briana Toole’s forthcoming chapter, “Standpoint Epistemology and the Epistemology of Deference,” featured in the Blackwell Companion to Epistemology. We are joined by two guests: Michelle Charette, who recently completed her PhD in Science and Technology Studies, and John Atytalla, who holds a PhD in Philosophy.​

Tilton and Toole critically examine the prevailing trend of epistemic deference – where individuals are encouraged to accept the judgments of marginalized groups as their own. While acknowledging the importance of recognizing marginalized perspectives, they argue that habitual deference can inadvertently hinder the socially dominant from cultivating essential epistemic skills, such as empathy and critical inquiry. They advocate for an epistemic framework centered on inclusion and active engagement rather than passive deference.

We had a mixture of audio setups in this episode, so there are a couple of audio anomalies.

Feature Image from Frits Ahlefeldt

The post EP26: Should We Defer To Marginalized Perspectives? (On Tilton and Toole’s Epistemology of Deference) appeared first on Academic Edgelords.