In this engaging discussion, New Testament scholar Dr. Peter Gurry and Old Testament scholar Dr. John Meade explore how we got the Bible. They unpack the reliability of biblical texts, touching on the fascinating history of early manuscripts and the debate surrounding their authorship. The conversation reveals insights about the significance of the Dead Sea Scrolls and how textual variants, like Goliath's height, impact interpretation. Personal reflections on faith through academic study add a compelling layer to the dialogue.
The Old Testament canon was formed through rigorous scrutiny and early community acceptance, illustrating its trustworthiness despite conspiracy theories.
Recent manuscript discoveries have invigorated textual criticism, revealing the dynamic transmission and preservation of biblical texts throughout history.
Textual variances between biblical versions, like the Septuagint and Masoretic Text, show minor discrepancies that don't undermine core theological beliefs.
Deep dives
The Formative Periods of the Old Testament Canon
The formation of the Old Testament canon occurred through three distinct periods, beginning with the pre-New Testament era. This phase heavily relied on texts recognized by Jewish communities, which included nearly all modern Old Testament books. The discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls further illustrated that early Jewish groups primarily quoted texts from what is now the Old Testament, reinforcing its recognized status. Subsequently, by around 100 AD, historical figures like Josephus noted that the Jewish canon comprised 22 accepted books, laying the groundwork for later Christian understanding of the Old Testament.
Responses to Claims of Biblical Conspiracies
When faced with accusations of conspiracy regarding the Bible's formation, scholars stress the lack of historical evidence supporting such claims. Instead, they encourage a focus on the rigorous process involved in determining which texts were canonical. The extensive research surrounding early canon lists—including those from the early church—reveals that none included the deuterocanonical books, highlighting a consistent historical view rather than secretive selection. This transparency underscores the trustworthiness of the Old Testament based on early community acceptance rather than fabricated narratives.
Exciting Developments in Textual Criticism
Textual criticism has made exciting strides, particularly with the advent of new manuscript discoveries, such as recently published papyrus fragments of the New Testament. Scholars are able to study newfound materials that offer insights into how biblical texts were transmitted and copied throughout history. This continual discovery process highlights the dynamic nature of textual studies and the careful work of ancient scribes who played a critical role in preserving scripture. Such discoveries not only enhance understanding but also instill confidence in the historical reliability of biblical texts.
Variances in Old Testament Texts and Their Implications
Variances between the Septuagint and the Masoretic Text present interesting scholarly challenges, particularly with stories such as David and Goliath. The textual evidence indicates that despite some differences, such as Goliath's height, these variants do not affect core theological beliefs or narratives fundamentally. Scholars examine the reasons behind textual variations, analyzing scribal tendencies to clarify and possibly embellish texts over time. This meticulous study reveals how the transmission of scripture has remained surprisingly cohesive despite minor discrepancies.
Confidence in the New Testament Manuscripts
The sheer volume of New Testament manuscripts provides scholars with a robust framework for understanding textual transmission throughout early Christianity. With approximately 2,000 copies of the Gospel of Matthew alone, researchers can cross-examine and verify textual accuracy, ensuring a reliable reconstruction of the original manuscripts. While early manuscripts may exhibit greater variance, the careful study reveals both strong and less reliable copies, illustrating a spectrum of quality rather than a blanket assumption of error. Ultimately, these efforts demonstrate a commitment to preserving the integrity of the New Testament, allowing for a confident approach to biblical texts.
How did we get the Bible? How many variants of the early manuscripts are there? Can we trust our biblical texts? Joining me today is New Testament scholar Dr. Peter Gurry and Old Testament scholar Dr. John Meade to discuss the trustworthiness of Scripture and how we can have confidence in our biblical text.
READ: Scribes and Scripture: The Amazing Story of How We Got the Bible, by John D. Meade and Peter J. Gurry (https://amz.run/68IN)
READ: A Rebel's Manifesto, by Sean McDowell (https://amzn.to/3u8s2Oz)
*Get a MASTERS IN APOLOGETICS or SCIENCE AND RELIGION at BIOLA (https://bit.ly/3LdNqKf)
*USE Discount Code [SMDCERTDISC] for $100 off the BIOLA APOLOGETICS CERTIFICATE program (https://bit.ly/3AzfPFM)
*See our fully online UNDERGRAD DEGREE in Bible, Theology, and Apologetics: (https://bit.ly/448STKK)
FOLLOW ME ON SOCIAL MEDIA:
Twitter: https://twitter.com/Sean_McDowell
TikTok: @sean_mcdowell
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/seanmcdowell/
Website: https://seanmcdowell.org
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
