Covenants: 90%/100% Consent Can be Bypassed Using Scheme, Part 26A Plan(Nov. 17, 2020)
Nov 17, 2020
auto_awesome
Shan Qureshi discusses the spotlight on consent thresholds for inserting new super senior debt after Serta Simmons, Boardriders, and Trimark. The podcast explores consensual vs non-consensual amendments, borrower's options for contract amendments, differences in consent thresholds, flexibility in implementing amendments and restructuring processes in England, and challenges faced by Swissport in creating a new super senior debt basket.
Consensual and non-consensual amendments are two options for implementing changes in debt documentation, with non-consensual amendments being facilitated by restructuring tools with lower consent thresholds.
The Swissport case study exemplifies the importance of correctly interpreting amendment provisions, inter-creditor agreements, and understanding the implications of partial amendments.
Deep dives
Options for Implementing Amendments
Borrowers have two options for implementing amendments: consensual or non-consensual. Consensual amendments involve obtaining the consent of creditors holding the required percentage of outstanding amounts under the debt documentation. Non-consensual amendments are implemented through restructuring tools like the English scheme of arrangement or the Part 26A restructuring plan, which have lower consent thresholds. The choice between the two options depends on the level of creditor support and the consent threshold for the amendments.
Advantages of Non-Consensual Amendments
Non-consensual amendments, facilitated by restructuring tools, can be used when contractual consent cannot be obtained due to dissenting creditors or disparate noteholdings. These tools, such as the English scheme of arrangement and Part 26A restructuring plan, allow for amendments that bind all creditors, even those who do not consent. The lower consent thresholds in these non-contractual mechanisms make them an attractive option for debtors.
Swissport Case Study and Lessons Learned
The Swissport case study demonstrates how a borrower used a combination of consensual and non-consensual amendments to address liquidity needs. They successfully amended the debt documentation through contractual consent for senior secured notes and used an English scheme of arrangement for the loan documentation. However, challenges arose when unamended inter-creditor agreements and dissenting noteholders were not consulted. This highlights the importance of correctly interpreting amendment provisions and inter-creditor agreements, as well as understanding the implications of partial amendments.
In the latest instalment in our Covenant Conversations podcast, Shweta Rao and guest Shan Qureshi discuss how consent thresholds, particularly those applicable for inserting a new tranche of super senior debt, are in the spotlight after Serta Simmons, Boardriders and Trimark.
If you're not already a Reorg subscriber, request access here: go.reorg-research.com/Podcast-Trial.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode