Lost civilizations and the promise of new knowledge
May 31, 2024
auto_awesome
Writer Graham Hancock discusses the theory of a lost civilization during the Ice Age, challenged by archaeologist Flint Dibble. Razib explains the lack of evidence for a global advanced civilization from the Pleistocene, but considers the existence of stillborn cultures. The podcast delves into the origins of civilizations, the debate between pseudo-science and scientific certainty, and the role of genetic evidence in understanding ancient societies.
Though no evidence supports a global Ice Age civilization, the concept of stillborn cultures challenges conventional historical narratives.
The importance of scientific rigor and humility in discussing lost civilizations is emphasized, highlighting the need for critical examination of historical claims.
Deep dives
Risk of Autism in Future Children of Siblings with Autism
Having a sibling with autism increases the risk of an autism diagnosis in future children by a factor of 2 to 3.5. Whole genome embryo reports can help mitigate this risk by screening for over 200 genetic variants definitively linked to autism and other neurodevelopmental disorders. Consultation with a genetics expert is advised for discussing individual situations.
Exploring Lost Civilizations
The podcast delves into the topic of lost civilizations, questioning the relevance of exploring such mysteries. The speaker discusses the concept of civilization, highlighting defining features like urban development, social stratification, and symbolic communication forms such as writing. By referring to past civilizations like the Uruk civilization, the conversation challenges conventional views on what constitutes a civilization.
Debate on Lost Civilizations with Flint Dibble
The podcast recounts a debate on lost civilizations featuring archaeologist Flint Dibble and the host. Dibble, considered an orthodox archaeologist, challenges theories proposed by proponents like Graham Hancock, questioning the existence of a global mega-civilization. The discussion emphasizes the importance of scientific rigor and humility in examining historical narratives.
Possibility of Ancient Proto-Societies
The episode speculates on the existence of complex proto-societies during the Pleistocene era before the rise of modern civilizations. The speaker suggests that previous societies, like the Vinča culture or the Varna civilization, may have exhibited characteristics of civilization such as social stratification and advanced infrastructure. The narrative explores the potential for human societies to have developed complex structures prior to recorded history.
On this episode of Unsupervised Learning Razib discusses the idea of “lost civilizations,” the possibility that there were complex societies during the Pleistocene Ice Age. This topic recently rose to salience after a dialogue between writer Graham Hancock and archaeologist Flint Dibble on Joe Rogan’s podcast. Hancock is a longtime guest on Rogan’s show and he promotes a theory that an advanced “lost civilization” during the Ice Age left remnants of its culture across the world, for example the pyramids of both Egypt and the New World. In the exchange, Dibble, a vigorous online critic of pseudo-archaeology came back with scientific orthodoxy; civilization emerged after the end of the Ice Age, and there is no evidence for anything during the Pleistocene.
Razib explains why evidence from biology makes it clear that Hancock is almost certainly wrong. No massively advanced global civilization during the Ice Age left its imprint across the world. Though the archaeological evidence is strong, the data from DNA is even more unambiguously robust and informative. But then Razib steps back and asks what “civilization” is, and presents the possibility that stillborn cultures might have existed during the Ice Age. Civilizations that left no descendants and barely any archaeological footprint. He also argues that the modern conception of civilization starting in Sumer and Egypt 5,000 years ago is simplistic, and American ideas about an arrow of history ascending onward and upward tend to be misleading as a guide to the past. Though the orthodox view is mostly right, there are always gaps in our knowledge and surprises around the corner. Graham Hancock’s enthusiasm for what we can know is commendable, his conclusions long ago outpaced his evidence. In the future, understanding the past will be done with even more powerful tools, but we must proceed with humility upon the foundations of all we know while acknowledging what we don’t.