The NPR Politics Podcast Supreme Court Weighs Trump’s Tariffs And The Limits Of Presidential Power
102 snips
Nov 6, 2025 The Supreme Court is mulling whether Trump overstepped his authority with his tariff policies. Arguments center on the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and the legitimacy of tariffs as a presidential power. A landmark exchange likens the issue to a 'donut hole,' highlighting the tension between regulation and revenue. Conservative experts also weigh in against broad executive tariff powers. The outcome could reshape Trump's economic toolbox and complicate the future of collected tariff funds. This case exemplifies a larger struggle over executive power in America.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
IEPA Powers Fuel Trump's Tariff Strategy
- President Trump uses the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEPA) to impose country-by-country tariffs without Congress or investigations.
- He cites broad emergencies like persistent trade deficits to justify unilateral tariff actions.
Challengers Say Tariffs Are A Congressional Power
- Challengers argue IEPA never authorized tariffs and was meant to limit presidential power after Nixon.
- They stress tariffs are effectively taxes and thus a power reserved to Congress.
Regulation Versus Revenue Is The Core Debate
- Government claims IEPA's phrase "regulate importation" includes tariffs as regulatory tools.
- Challengers counter that revenue-raising is a different constitutional power the president cannot wield.