Economist Jeff Miron discusses the negative impacts of rent control on housing affordability. He debunks the misconception that rent control is a simple solution, highlighting how it reduces rental housing availability, affects apartment owners in NYC, and hinders mobility in the rental market. Miron advocates for income transfer to low-income individuals for affordable housing, emphasizing the importance of stimulating housing supply.
Rent control reduces affordable housing availability.
Rent control does not resolve supply and demand imbalance in housing market.
Deep dives
Negative Impact of Rent Control on Housing Availability
Rent control, although presented as a solution to high housing prices, actually exacerbates the problem by discouraging the expansion of affordable housing. When rent control is implemented, landlords may reduce maintenance, cut back on amenities, and become selective about tenants to offset revenue losses. This leads to a decrease in rental housing availability, making it harder for individuals to find suitable units.
Ineffectiveness of Rent Control in Addressing Core Housing Issues
Rent control fails to address the fundamental problem of supply and demand imbalance in the housing market. By restricting the supply of rental housing without stimulating demand or expanding housing options, rent control ultimately leads to a decline in housing availability over time. Alternative solutions, such as housing voucher programs or removing restrictions on new construction, are more effective in addressing the root cause of high housing prices.
Rent control doesn't make housing more affordable. It makes affordable housing less available. Jeff Miron explains in his essay in the new book, The War on Prices.