Exploring the ordeal of journalist Steve Baker post-January 6th and implications for press freedom. Unjust treatment by authorities, ethical dilemmas in law enforcement, and defiance against political tyranny and unfair arrests.
Read more
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
auto_awesome
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
Independent journalist Steve Baker faced biased treatment by the FBI for non-violent actions on January 6.
Mainstream media outlets support official narratives while independent journalists aim to observe events objectively.
Deep dives
Journalists Covering January 6 Event
On January 6, 2021, amidst the crowd at the Capitol, journalists from mainstream media like the Associated Press and independent journalists like Steve Baker were present to report on the unfolding news story. While mainstream media aimed to support official narratives, independent journalists, including Baker, were there to observe and cover the events without engaging in any violent activities.
Unjust Treatment of Independent Journalists
Despite being present as a journalist to cover the story at the Capitol on January 6, independent journalist Steve Baker was singled out by the FBI and charged with crimes such as disruptive conduct and restricted building charges. This treatment contrasts with that of mainstream media journalists, highlighting a bias towards regime-endorsed media outlets.
Insight into the FBI's Handling of Misdemeanor Offenders
Baker's experience sheds light on the FBI's processing of misdemeanor offenders related to the January 6 events. While facing charges for non-violent misdemeanors, Baker observed discrepancies in the treatment of defendants, with some being swat-raided at home despite minimal involvement in the Capitol incident, indicating a concerning pattern of enforcement.
Joe Biden has put hundreds of his political opponents in jail. Here’s the latest, a working journalist who’s exposed the fraudulence of the January 6th myth.