This podcast explores the history of crackdowns on news 'distortion' in the U.S. It discusses the fear of giving federal agencies power to determine truth in news outlets and the negative impact it can have on free speech. The podcast also covers the history and impact of FCC licensing and regulations on news coverage, the origins of news distortion and its manipulative use, and the history of the fairness doctrine and its implications for free speech in broadcasting.
Government control over news truth can suppress free speech and civil liberties.
Allowing the government to fact-check and punish news outlets in broadcasting threatens freedom of speech.
Deep dives
The dangers of giving the government power over news outlets
In this podcast episode, the speaker discusses the potential consequences of giving the government the power to determine the truthfulness and responsibility of news outlets. He highlights a specific case where a progressive group has sued a Fox News affiliate for news distortion in the coverage of the 2020 election. This bipartisan effort, supported by both progressives and conservatives, could set a dangerous precedent where the truthfulness of news becomes a political football. The speaker emphasizes that such power in the hands of the government can lead to the suppression of free speech and civil liberties.
Historic examples of using FCC licensing to control news narratives
The speaker goes on to provide historical examples of how presidents and politicians have attempted to control news narratives by using FCC licensing. He mentions the fairness doctrine and news distortion standards as regulations that were misused to silence voices that criticized political figures or parties. These examples demonstrate how giving the government the authority to determine news truth can result in biased and politically motivated decision-making. Despite the likelihood of constitutional challenges, the speaker emphasizes the chilling effect that even unsuccessful attempts can have on free speech.
The risks of allowing unelected officials to make determinations about news truth
The podcast explores the potential risks of allowing unelected lawyers or AI programs to determine the truthfulness of news. The speaker raises concerns about political incentives, lack of public accountability, and the abuse of power that can arise from such a system. He compares the two-tier system of free speech in the United States, where broadcasting has been more susceptible to government regulation than print media. This fight over news truth and FCC licensing, while unthinkable in a print newspaper context, reflects the historical precedent of government control over broadcasting. Allowing the government to fact-check and punish news outlets in the broadcasting industry threatens the fundamental principles of freedom of speech.
Political actors are more than happy to attempt to bend media outlets to serve their preferred narratives. The history of it in the U.S. is less well known. Paul Matzko discusses a chapter in the history of crackdowns on news "distortion."