
WSJ Opinion: Potomac Watch Are 'Independent’ Agencies Unconstitutional? Supreme Court Justices Debate
7 snips
Dec 8, 2025 The Supreme Court tackles whether the President can fire FTC commissioners, challenging a long-standing precedent. Justices debate the balance of power between branches of government and the historical role of independent agencies. There's a discussion on how these agencies blur the lines between legislative and judicial functions. Additionally, a case about campaign finance limits raises questions about First Amendment rights and party accountability. The implications for future independent agency dynamics and presidential control are explored with great scrutiny.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Independent Agencies And Humphrey's Legacy
- The Humphrey's Executor precedent insulated multi-member agencies from presidential removal and enabled a powerful administrative state.
- Kim Strassel argues that this blending of powers defies the Constitution and created unaccountable expert agencies.
Wilson's Expert Class Transformed Governance
- Kim Strassel links Woodrow Wilson's vision of government by experts to today's insulated agencies with quasi-legislative powers.
- She contends agencies now legislate and enforce rules that the Constitution intended Congress to make.
Coin Flip For Antitrust Enforcement
- Kyle Peterson notes the FTC and DOJ sometimes flip a coin to decide which enforces an antitrust matter.
- That quirky example highlights arbitrary enforcement and overlapping agency roles.
