“‘Slow’ takeoff is a terrible term for ‘maybe even faster takeoff, actually’” by Raemon
Sep 29, 2024
auto_awesome
In this enlightening discussion, Paul Christiano, known for popularizing the term 'slow takeoff' in AI development, sheds light on the confusion surrounding AI timelines. He argues that 'slow' should not imply longer calendar periods but rather smoother, continuous progress, which can actually accelerate development. Paul advocates for clearer terminology to enhance communication in the tech community, ensuring that policymakers and innovators can better navigate the complexities of AI advancements.
The term 'slow takeoff' is misleading as it can imply both prolonged timelines and faster, smoother advancements in AI development.
Confusing terminology in AI discussions could hinder effective policymaking and strategic planning, emphasizing the need for clearer language.
Deep dives
Redefining Takeoff Terminology
The discussion highlights the confusion surrounding the term 'slow takeoff' in the context of AI development. Traditionally, 'slow takeoff' was assumed to imply a prolonged time frame for achieving full AI capabilities, but it can also denote a smooth and continuous evolution that may actually occur more quickly. This misinterpretation can lead to significant misunderstandings among policymakers and strategists who are not familiar with the nuances of the terminology. The suggestion is made to adopt clearer terms like 'smooth' and 'sharp' takeoff to avoid conflating the concepts of smoothness with longer timelines.
Impact of Misunderstanding on AI Strategy
The misuse of terminology related to AI takeoff can create real-world consequences and misguidance in strategic planning. The speaker expresses concern that continued reliance on ambiguous terms may result in policymakers approaching the AI landscape with misleading frames of reference. This ongoing confusion not only complicates discussions but also risks wasting valuable time in important decision-making processes. The importance of adopting more intuitive terminology is emphasized to ensure that discussions around AI development remain productive and accurate.
1.
Clarifying AI Takeoff Terminology for Better Discourse
For a long time, when I heard "slow takeoff", I assumed it meant "takeoff that takes longer calendar time than fast takeoff." (i.e. what is now referred to more often as "short timelines" vs "long timelines."). I think Paul Christiano popularized the term, and it so happened he both expected to see longer timelines and smoother/continuous takeoff.
I think it's at least somewhat confusing to use the term "slow" to mean "smooth/continuous", because that's not what "slow" particularly means most of the time.
I think it's even more actively confusing because "smooth/continuous" takeoff not only could be faster in calendar time, but, I'd weakly expect this on average, since smooth takeoff means that AI resources at a given time are feeding into more AI resources, whereas sharp/discontinuous takeoff would tend to mean "AI tech doesn't get seriously applied towards AI development until towards the end."
I don't think this [...]
The original text contained 1 footnote which was omitted from this narration.