Slate correspondent Justin Peters discusses Fox News' influence in elections, the network's manipulation tactics, and its future amidst competition and legal challenges. They explore the network's role in the 2024 election and the impact of its coverage on Donald Trump's presidency.
Fox News uses divisive narratives to influence elections by portraying Democrats negatively.
The symbiotic relationship between Trump administration and Fox News hosts impacts public opinion and political decisions.
Deep dives
Fox News and Presidential Elections Coverage Strategy
Fox News strategically shapes its coverage during presidential elections to influence public perception. The podcast discusses how Fox News creates a narrative of a country under siege through name-calling and image-laden storytelling. By focusing on amplifying chaos and portraying Democrats negatively, Fox aims to sway public opinion and potentially impact election outcomes.
Trump Administration and Fox News Relationship Dynamics
The podcast delves into the intricate relationship dynamics between the Trump administration and Fox News personalities. It highlights the symbiotic connection between Trump and Fox News hosts, where hosts like Sean Hannity held substantial influence. This influence extended to impacting decision-making within the administration, emphasizing the blurred lines between media influence and political power.
Fox News Influence and Potential Decline
The episode reflects on Fox News' evolving influence and potential decline amidst key events like the Arizona election call debacle and the Dominion voting settlement. Despite challenges and internal shifts, Fox News remains a potent force in shaping public opinion. While facing criticisms and internal changes, Fox News's narrative-building abilities could still impact undecided voters in crucial swing states during elections.
Hit with an $800 million lawsuit, missing Tucker Carlson and Rupert Murdoch, and facing competition from fanatical fringe-right media, Fox News might look to some viewers like it’s slipping. But election years are the network’s bread and butter, and the old “everything is terrible and the Democrats are why” song still resonates with voters.
Want more What Next? Subscribe to Slate Plus to access ad-free listening to the whole What Next family and across all your favorite Slate podcasts. Subscribe today on Apple Podcasts by clicking “Try Free” at the top of our show page. Sign up now at slate.com/whatnextplus to get access wherever you listen.
Podcast production by Elena Schwartz, Paige Osburn, Anna Phillips, Madeline Ducharme and Rob Gunther.