This podcast explores the historical event in which women testified and shared stories about their abortions, leading to changes in women's rights. It discusses the impact of the Women's Liberation Group, the legalization of abortion in New York, and the Women's Convention in Houston. It also touches on the rally against the Equal Rights Amendment, the controversial film The Silent Scream, and the erosion of truth in society.
The practice of 'speaking bitterness' or sharing personal stories like abortions in consciousness-raising groups played a significant role in challenging patriarchal perspectives and exposing the limitations of male-dominated discussions about women's issues.
The emphasis on personal narratives and the belief in women's experiences in movements like #MeToo have led to a clash of competing absolute truths, blurring the line between subjective perception and objective facts.
Deep dives
The Rise of Consciousness Raising in the Women's Liberation Movement
In the 1960s, radical feminists emphasized the importance of personal experience and feelings as evidence to analyze their common situation, leading to the rise of consciousness raising groups. Through speaking bitterness, women shared their personal stories, like abortions, to find solidarity and expose the limitations of patriarchal perspectives. The women's liberation movement used this approach to challenge the male-dominated expert-driven discussions about abortion and other women's issues.
The Clash of Feminist Movements at the National Women's Conference
In the 1970s, liberal feminists joined the victim's rights movement, seeking tougher laws and harsher punishments for violent crimes against women and children. The National Women's Conference in 1977 aimed to adopt a national plan of action, but became divided over issues like abortion and homosexuality. Conservative women organized a counter-conference, led by Phyllis Schlafly, to resist the Equal Rights Amendment, using arguments about abortion and homosexuality as rallying points. The clashes between different feminist factions and conservative groups influenced the direction and public perception of the women's movement.
The Influence of Victim Impact Evidence in Criminal Trials
In the 1980s, the victim's rights movement influenced legal proceedings by advocating for victim impact evidence, allowing victims to testify about their suffering during sentencing hearings. Victim impact evidence, rooted in the tradition of speaking your truth, aimed to raise awareness of the harm experienced by victims and push for harsher punishments for criminals. However, this approach also generated debates about the role of emotions and personal experiences in the courtroom, blurring the line between fact and subjective perception.
The Epistemological Chaos of Absolute Truths
More recently, the Me Too movement has embraced the principles of speaking your truth and believing women's experiences. The movement led to high-profile cases where victims shared their stories publicly, like the sentencing hearing of Larry Nassar. However, as personal narratives dominate discourse, debates turn into clashes between competing absolute truths, causing an epistemological chaos where the validity of truth becomes subjective and objective facts are overshadowed.
In 1969, radical feminists known as the Redstockings gathered in a church in Greenwich Village, and spoke about their experiences with abortion. They called this ‘consciousness-raising’ or ‘speaking bitterness,’ and it changed the history of women’s rights, all the way down to the 1977 National Women’s Convention and, really, down to the present day. The idea of ‘speaking bitterness’ came from a Maoist practice, and is a foundation to both the #MeToo movement and the conservative Victim’s Rights movement. But at what cost?