Will MacAskill, an Oxford philosophy professor and a key voice in the effective altruism movement, delves into its aims to maximize global welfare. He addresses the backlash against the movement due to Sam Bankman-Fried's involvement, advocating for a reevaluation of its principles. The discussion explores critical topics like ethical obligations towards altruism, the risks of modern technology, and the necessity of long-term thinking in the face of existential threats like AI. MacAskill encourages listeners to rethink their choices for a brighter future.
Effective altruism promotes maximizing the benefits of philanthropy, which has recently been overshadowed by controversies surrounding influential figures like Sam Bankman-Fried.
The movement's reliance on utilitarianism invites criticism for potentially oversimplifying moral complexities and neglecting the emotional aspects of charitable giving.
Will MacAskill emphasizes prioritizing immediate global challenges and adopting a long-term perspective to effectively safeguard the future of humanity.
Deep dives
Understanding Effective Altruism
Effective altruism is a philanthropic approach that aims to maximize the good one can do with their resources, focusing on the well-being of the greatest number of people. The movement gained significant visibility through figures like Sam Bankman-Fried, who advocated for earning money to give it away, specifically targeting long-term risks. However, after his legal troubles, many viewed his actions as detrimental to the credibility of effective altruism, sparking a debate about the movement's integrity. Critics argue that the focus on abstract, quantifiable measures can lead to a neglect of immediate, tangible issues like poverty.
Critique of Utilitarianism
The reliance on utilitarianism in effective altruism has prompted discussion about the potential failures of quantifying morality. Nate Silver argues that such an overemphasis can distort moral reasoning, making it difficult to empathize with real-world suffering that isn’t easily quantifiable. This perspective raises concerns about reducing human experiences to mere data points and losing sight of the emotional and ethical dimensions of philanthropy. A balance must be struck between rational decision-making and the humane aspects of charitable giving.
Philosophical Foundations and Personal Experiences
Philosopher Will McCaskill drew inspiration from Peter Singer’s prominent essay on moral obligation, which emphasizes the need for individuals to act morally by aiding those in poverty. He argues that individuals should aim to give at least 10% of their income, which is a feasible target for most people in wealthy nations. His commitment to effective altruism is manifest in his own lifestyle choices, wherein he pledges to live modestly to donate significantly to charity. This approach demonstrates the impact personal philosophy can have on broader movements in philanthropy.
The Urgency of Addressing Global Issues
Effective altruism emphasizes the immediate need for addressing pressing global challenges, such as pandemics and nuclear risks, rather than waiting until later in life to give. McCaskill advocates for a shift in philanthropic strategies towards prioritizing the most effective causes, arguing that the current approach is insufficient given the urgent global crises we face today. This urgency is evidenced by the immediate risks posed by emerging technologies, like artificial intelligence, that could have far-reaching consequences for humanity. The effective altruism movement encourages a rethinking of how and when individuals contribute to global welfare.
Long-Termism and Future Generations
Long-termism is a philosophical extension of effective altruism that seeks to secure a better future for forthcoming generations, emphasizing the moral weight of decisions affecting society's long-term trajectory. McCaskill highlights the importance of preventing catastrophic events that could derail humanity’s progress, such as engineered pandemics or risks from advanced technologies. He argues for prioritization of initiatives that safeguard future prosperity and ethical considerations that overall contribute to a sustainable future. By integrating the interests of future generations into current decisions, society has the potential to foster a flourishing and resilient global community.
Effective altruism — the brand of philanthropy where you try to do the most good for the greatest number of people with the resources you have — has gotten a bad rap lately due to its association with Sam Bankman-Fried, the disgraced crypto wunderkind who was once hailed as the movement's poster child. But is the bad press fair? Today, we explore that question by revisiting our conversation with Will MacAskill, Oxford professor of philosophy, leading figure in the movement, and author of "What We Owe the Future."
(This episode first aired in October 2022.)
🎁 Get 20% off a Next Big Idea Club membership when you use code PODCAST at https://nextbigideaclub.com/
