

What Counts As An Official Act? Why Corruption Is Hard To Convict
Sep 25, 2023
A New Jersey senator is embroiled in serious corruption charges, including bribery and hefty cash finds. The discussion sheds light on the hurdles prosecutors face in winning such cases. The complexities of political accountability and shifting party dynamics are explored, as well as the calls for resignation from fellow politicians. The podcast also examines how this indictment might affect perceptions of the Department of Justice and details the legal tussles surrounding proving corruption in politics.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Menendez's Defense
- Menendez's defense for the cash found in his home is that he withdrew it from his savings over 30 years.
- He claims a lack of faith in the system due to his Cuban immigrant background, but didn't address the gold bars.
Political Pressure on Democrats
- Democrats face pressure to differentiate themselves from Trump's conduct.
- Menendez's visually damning case makes it easier for Democrats to uphold their ethical image.
Difficulty of Proving Corruption
- The 2016 Supreme Court case involving former Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell raised the bar for defining 'official acts'.
- Proving quid pro quo is now harder, potentially benefiting Menendez's defense.