Sam Rosenfeld, an associate professor at Colgate University, and Daniel Schlozman, a political science expert at Johns Hopkins, delve into the complexities of American political parties. They explore the concept of 'party hollowness' and how it contributes to polarization. The duo discusses Biden's chaotic 2020 nomination, reflecting on the fragmentation within both parties. Historical shifts, including the impact of single-issue movements and neoliberalism, reveal the evolving dynamics. Through this analysis, they emphasize the need for revitalized political infrastructure.
Political parties in the U.S. face 'hollowness' due to their reliance on external groups, undermining cohesive policy formulation.
The fragmentation within the Democratic Party illustrates the need for revitalized local organizations to enhance grassroots engagement.
Deep dives
Understanding Party Hollowness
Party hollowness refers to the paradox of political parties being significant in American politics yet lacking the capacity to influence their own agendas. Both Republicans and Democrats experience this phenomenon differently, with Democrats often appearing ineffective due to their reliance on external entities, such as interest groups and PACs, rather than leveraging their internal resources. This over-dependence on outside organizations undermines the party's ability to formulate a cohesive policy consensus, resulting in a disorganized political identity. Simultaneously, Republicans face their own challenges, as the emergence of paraparty actors since the 1970s has disrupted traditional party structures, transforming the party into a platform for more extreme views, culminating in the rise of figures like Donald Trump.
The Democratic Party's Evolution
The Democratic Party's post-reform era has been characterized by what is termed as 'listlessness,' marked by internal conflicts and a lack of strategic coherence. This evolution can be traced back to the reforms launched during the McGovern-Fraser Commission, which significantly shifted nomination processes and fundamentally altered party dynamics. The push for wider representation inadvertently led to disorganization within the party as various factions prioritized their interests over a unified party agenda, leaving a void in leadership and direction. Consequently, as this fragmentation has persisted, Democratic candidates have struggled to create a strong, cohesive narrative that resonates well with a diverse voter base.
Lessons from Jesse Jackson's Campaign
Jesse Jackson's presidential runs in the 1980s highlighted the potential for political change and mobilization within the Democratic Party, showcasing his intent to focus on issues pertinent to African Americans. His campaigns were not primarily about securing the nomination but about advocating for meaningful discussions around racial and economic justice within the party. Jackson's approach emphasized the importance of local party conventions and the power they had to shape agendas, contrasting with later political trends that diminished grassroots involvement. This historical context illustrates the necessity for a revitalized Democratic Party to harness grassroots movements, particularly in light of today's challenges and its reliance on big donors.
The Need for Local Party Strengthening
Revitalizing political parties as civic institutions requires a strong focus on building local party organizations that can effectively mobilize community engagement and participation. Current dynamics, wherein national party organizations dominate and local entities wither, highlight the urgent need for a renewed commitment to local party development. Engaging communities necessitates resources and actionable strategies that foster grassroots participation, allowing parties to cultivate support across various regions. Emphasizing long-term investments in state and local parties, alongside addressing external funding competition, can provide the structural integrity needed for parties to endure and succeed.
In this week’s episode of Politics In Question, Julia and Lee talk with Sam Rosenfeld and Daniel Schlozman about the evolution of political parties in the United States. Rosenfeld is an is Associate Professor of Political Science at Colgate University and Scholzman is a Joseph and Bertha Bernstein Associate Professor of Political Science at John Hopkins University. They are the authors of The Hollow Parties: The Many Pasts and Disordered Present of American Party Politics(Princeton University Press, 2024).
Why are parties locked in a polarized struggle for power? How did Biden’s nomination illustrate party hollowness? How has the political economy of parties shifted? These are some of the questions Lee and Julia ask in this week’s episode.
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode