Coffee House Shots Should cannabis be decriminalised?
May 31, 2025
Charlie Falconer is a Labour peer and former cabinet minister who chaired the London Drugs Commission, while Neil Shastri-Hurst is a Conservative MP, doctor, and barrister. They delve into the complex debate on cannabis decriminalization, prompted by recent recommendations to revise existing laws. Falconer argues current laws are ineffective, while Shastri-Hurst warns against conveying that cannabis is harmless. They examine the balance between enforcement and compassion, discussing societal impacts, public health concerns, and the need for thoughtful legal reform.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Ineffective Cannabis Laws Harm Society
- The current criminal law on cannabis is ineffective and unfair, especially due to disproportionate stop and search practices.
- Removing possession of herbal cannabis from the Misuse of Drugs Act could reduce harms without increasing use.
Cannabis Harms Mental Health Services
- Cannabis use can lead to serious mental health issues such as psychosis, anxiety, and depression.
- Decriminalising cannabis could increase pressure on already strained NHS mental health and addiction services.
Decriminalisation Doesn't Boost Use
- Evidence shows decriminalising cannabis possession does not increase usage significantly.
- Current laws cause community harm and waste resources enforcing unpopular rules.