Trump’s Rage at CBS over Kamala Interview Takes a Dark, Dangerous Turn
Oct 11, 2024
auto_awesome
Michael Sozan, a senior fellow at the Center for American Progress Action Fund, dives into Trump's escalating attacks on CBS News regarding Kamala Harris's interview. He warns that Trump's threats to revoke broadcasting licenses signal a chilling authoritarian shift. Sozan discusses Project 2025 and its implications for government independence. The conversation also sheds light on troubling parallels between U.S. media dynamics and authoritarian regimes abroad, raising alarms about the potential erosion of democratic norms under a second Trump term.
Trump's escalating attacks on CBS News signal a dangerous precedent for media freedom and the potential for authoritarian governance.
Project 2025 outlines a troubling strategy for manipulating media through government power, echoing tactics used by global authoritarian regimes.
Deep dives
Trump's Attacks on CBS News
Donald Trump has recently intensified his attacks on CBS News, accusing the network of manipulating Kamala Harris's interview on 60 Minutes to hide her lack of competence. His claims include that CBS should lose its broadcasting license over alleged misrepresentations in their edited content. However, experts argue that media outlets regularly edit interviews, which is protected under the First Amendment, and Trump's anger stems from CBS accurately reporting on his withdrawal from a scheduled interview. This situation serves as a troubling indicator of how a potential Trump presidency could seek to undermine the media's role in holding power accountable.
Project 2025 and Media Control
Project 2025 outlines a vision for a more authoritarian presidency where the executive branch could manipulate the Federal Communications Commission to target media organizations that criticize the administration. This strategy includes threats to revoke licenses and conducting dubious investigations into media companies. The report highlights that a president could exert pressure on journalists, leading them to self-censor for fear of losing access or facing bureaucratic harassment. The implications of such actions are significant, as they could severely restrict independent reporting and challenge the fundamental democratic principles of a free press.
Comparisons with Global Authoritarianism
The constraints on media freedom seen in Project 2025 draw unsettling parallels to tactics employed by authoritarian regimes worldwide, such as Hungary and India, where leaders have systematically undermined independent journalism. The ongoing political climate suggests an increasing trend toward authoritarian practices domestically, exemplified by actions taken by figures like Ron DeSantis in Florida. Experts warn that dismissing Trump's rhetoric as mere hyperbole overlooks the strategic and serious nature of the threats they pose to democracy. These developments highlight the urgent need for vigilance in protecting democratic institutions and the media's role in society.
In recent days, Donald Trump has escalated his attacks on CBS News, raging at the network over something they supposedly did involving Kamala Harris’s interview on “60 minutes.” He has now stated repeatedly that CBS should lose its broadcasting license. We think this is a clear warning about what a second Trump term would look like. We talked to Michael Sozan, author of a new report for the Center for American Progress Action Fund on Project 2025. He gets specific about how an authoritarian Trump presidency could use government power to bring independent media to heel.