Champion of voting rights, Marc Elias, joins Jen Rubin to discuss Trump's court cases, Republican war on voting rights, and hope in recent wins. They explore gerrymandering, rogue legislatures, and attacking early voting. They highlight courts defending democracy and our power to stand up for important values.
Republican war on voting rights through gerrymandering and attacking early voting
Courts stepping up to defend democracy and individual power to stand up for values
Deep dives
Media's Inadequate Coverage of Presidential Campaign
The press has been criticized for treating the current presidential campaign like any other campaign, failing to acknowledge the gravity of the situation. The contest is seen as a battle between fascism and democracy, with one party embracing a right-wing strongman. The media's coverage has normalized the Republican Party and Trump, making them appear more acceptable and normal. This failure to highlight the dangers and inappropriate behavior of the GOP and Trump is detrimental to the American people's understanding and allows for the perpetuation of delusions and support for such figures.
Trump's Legal Strategy: Ineffectiveness and Poor Representation
Trump's legal strategy has been ineffective, with his lawyers failing to do him any favors. Their aggressive and confrontational approach has backfired, causing judges to reprimand them for their behavior. Trump's lawyers have not been able to control what they say publicly, often making frivolous arguments. Their approach does not serve their client well, giving an unfavorable impression in court and undermining their own case. These poor legal tactics have been a consequence of underestimating the opposing side's preparedness and legal acumen, ultimately harming Trump's defense.
Voting Rights and Gerrymandering Challenges
Voting rights and gerrymandering cases have been a significant focus of litigation. Republicans continue their efforts to suppress and distort voting, targeting minority voters and undermining democracy. The courts have demonstrated some commitment to protecting voting rights, ruling against Republican attempts in many cases. However, the fight to safeguard fair elections and prevent partisan gerrymandering persists. Efforts to establish neutral commissions, like the one in Ohio, aim to address the issue, but challenges remain in enforcing these reforms and ensuring compliance with court orders.
The Uncertain State of the Federal Courts
The Federal courts, including the Supreme Court, are experiencing uncertainty and inconsistency, impacting the rule of law. Doctrine such as the major questions doctrine, which limits Congress's ability to delegate authority to regulatory agencies, and the court's handling of cases like the Texas abortion law and the independent state legislature doctrine raise concerns about politicization and unpredictability. Precedent and traditional principles are disregarded, and decisions seem results-driven rather than rooted in established legal principles. The erosion of clarity and reliance on precedent poses risk to the integrity and fairness of the judicial system.
Jen talks with champion of voting rights Marc Elias to review developments in the court cases facing Trump relating to aggressive actions by his lawyers, his threatening behavior, and the attempts to move Georgia cases to federal court. Then, they lay out the Republican war on voting rights through their efforts to influence elections by gerrymandering, the rogue legislatures like Alabama’s ignoring the courts, and attacking early voting. However; they find hope in the recent Wisconsin Supreme Court election win, how courts are stepping up to defend democracy, and our individual power to stand up for our most important values.