Trump-MAGA Erupt in Fury at CBS over Debate—and Expose Their Vile Scam
Oct 3, 2024
auto_awesome
Jamison Foser, a sharp writer exploring the media-political right nexus, dives into the recent vice-presidential debate fallout. He details the intense backlash from Trump and his supporters after CBS fact-checked J.D. Vance's misleading claims. The conversation examines the troubling trend of media capitulation to authoritarian tactics and the propagation of misinformation. Foser emphasizes the necessity for accountability in journalism and the importance of confronting false narratives to preserve media integrity and public discourse.
The backlash from Trump and MAGA supporters against CBS News highlights the campaign's reliance on a culture of unchallenged dishonesty.
Jameson Foser emphasizes that the media's capitulation to right-wing grievances undermines journalistic integrity and fosters a dangerous environment for accountability.
Deep dives
Fact-Checking and Political Impunity
The recent vice presidential debate highlighted the minimal fact-checking performed by CBS News, which led to backlash from Donald Trump and his allies. J.D. Vance's exaggerated claims about Haitians in Springfield, Ohio, were met with a simple correction from the moderator, resulting in outrage from conservative representatives. This incident underscores the broader strategy of the Trump campaign that relies on promoting unchallenged narratives and discouraging media scrutiny. The expectation among figures like Trump and Vance is that they can speak without facing any contradiction, fostering an environment where dishonesty can flourish without consequence.
Comparison with Past Political Coverage
Jameson Foser discusses the differing media treatment of Trump and Vance compared to Al Gore during the 2000 election, where Gore was labeled as untrustworthy based on exaggerated or inaccurate portrayals. This established a strict narrative about Gore that overshadowed his actual policies and positions. In contrast, while the media does occasionally fact-check Trump and Vance, the framing often centers around their deceitful claims rather than highlighting their untrustworthiness. This behavioral trend presents a danger by enabling the narrative dictated by the deceivers, rather than challenging the integrity of their statements.
The Dilemma of Media Responsibility
A pressing concern raised is the media's capitulation to right-wing grievances, which leads to subpar journalistic practices in an effort to avoid backlash. Ignoring fact-checking or succumbing to demands from political figures creates an environment where accountability is diminished. The responsibility of the press should center on accurately informing the public, rather than appeasing political figures, regardless of their influence. Without a commitment to quality journalism, the media risks enhancing the power of misinformation while failing to uphold its role as a critical check on power.
At the vice-presidential debate, the CBS News moderators fact-checked one of JD Vance’s lies—and that was all it took to trigger an epic attack on CBS from Donald Trump and his MAGA allies. Which highlights a larger story: The degree to which Trump’s campaign is built on an immense superstructure of endless, shameless lying. Bullying the media into not fact checking Trump and Vance is essential to that project. We talked to Jamison Foser, who writes about the media and the right on his Finding Gravity Substack, about the ways our institutions are capitulating to authoritarian attacks and threats—and what can be done in response.