ABC News Daily Why Trump wants to take over Greenland
Jan 7, 2026
Stephen Lammy, Professor Emeritus of International Relations at USC and Arctic politics expert, dives into Trump's renewed interest in annexing Greenland. He questions the security rationale behind this desire and highlights economic motives, particularly rare earth mining and countering China. Lammy explains the practical challenges of large-scale mining in Greenland and warns of the absence of legal justification for such actions. He also discusses how Trump's unpredictability risks eroding trust with U.S. allies, impacting NATO relationships.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
US Military Option Raises Alarm
- The White House suggested using the US military to take control of Greenland, framing it as a security option.
- European allies swiftly rejected any threat to Greenland's sovereignty, warning it would harm NATO.
Security Case Is Weak
- Stephen Lammy says the security rationale for seizing Greenland is weak and outdated.
- He argues the Cold War strategic value of the Greenland-Iceland gap has largely waned.
Economics, Not Defense, Drive Interest
- Lammy identifies economic motives—especially rare earth minerals—as the true driver behind the US interest.
- He highlights logistical and workforce limits that currently hinder Greenland mining development.