

Excessive force—or self-defence? The law should protect victims
Sep 11, 2025
Joanna Baron, a writer at The Hub and author of a thought-provoking article on self-defense, discusses the contentious topic of homeowners’ rights during break-ins. She argues compellingly for supporting homeowners who protect themselves, contrasting this with public sentiment towards criminality. The conversation touches on legal reforms, societal perceptions, and historical viewpoints on self-defense. Joanna also briefly explores the slow adoption of AI in Canadian workplaces, highlighting the disparity between employee and leader perspectives on technology use.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Kleinburg Home Invasion Sparks Backlash
- The Kleinburg home invasion left Abdul Alim Faruqi shot in front of his family and provoked public outrage.
- Joanna Barron highlights the visceral reaction to police urging victims to ‘‘stand down’’ during violent break-ins.
Self-Defence Rooted In Legal Tradition
- Historical legal thought treats the right of self-defence as fundamental and inalienable.
- Thinkers from Hobbes to Blackstone justify lethal force when violent burglary invades the home.
Poilievre's Proposed Home-Defense Presumption
- Pierre Poilievre proposes a statutory presumption that force used against unlawful home entry is reasonable.
- The change would shift initial legal presumption toward homeowners in violent break-ins.