Explore the differences between original sin and inherited sin in Western and Eastern Christianity. Discuss the concept of sin entering the world through Adam's disobedience, affecting all individuals. Delve into views on sin, guilt, righteousness, and the theological implications of inherited punishment. Analyze perspectives on sin transmission, including the fate of unbaptized infants and the role of God's grace in reconciliation.
Both Western and Eastern churches agree on the impact of Adam's sin leading to individual sinfulness and the universal need for salvation.
The Eastern Church distinguishes between inheriting the consequences of Adam's sin and inheriting the sin itself, clarifying the origin of humanity's sinful nature.
Deep dives
Common Ground on Sin's Impact
Both Western and Eastern churches agree that sin's presence at the beginning of our lives affects us, leading to individual sinfulness and the universal need for salvation. This shared understanding acknowledges the pervasive influence of sin that originated from Adam's transgression.
Eastern Church: Inherited Consequences, Not Sin Itself
The Eastern Church's perspective on ancestral sin emphasizes inheriting the consequences of Adam's sin, such as mortality and disordered affections, but not the sin itself. This distinction clarifies that while humanity bears the results of Adam's actions, the culpability for the original sin lies with him, not passed down to individuals.
Western Church: Augustine's Doctrine of Original Sin
Augustine's doctrine of original sin asserts that humanity not only suffers the consequences of Adam's sin but also inherits the sin itself and its resulting punishment. This view highlights the foundational belief in the transmission of inherent sinfulness from Adam, impacting concepts of guilt, punishment, and humanity's condition apart from God's grace.
Learn the difference between the Western and Eastern accounts of how we were corrupted by Adam's sin. Is it a substantial disagreement or only a difference of terms?