Angry Planet The Iran Strikes Beg the Question: What Is Airpower For?
You can’t win a war with airpower alone, despite what the U.S. Air Force will tell you. For more than 100 years, the masters of the air have promised that military and political objectives can be achieved if you just let them drop enough bombs.
It’s a theory that’s been tested, and fallen short, many times. Operation Midnight Hammer, the Trump administration’s use of 14 GBU-57A/B Massive Ordnance Penetrators on Iranian nuclear sites, is just the latest test. The promise is that this has set back Iran’s nuclear program (it probably has) but Israel is hoping for much more—regime change in the Islamic Republic.
Time will tell, but I’m not betting on it.
On this episode of Angry Planet we zoom out and talk about the strategy behind airpower in the 21st century. Robert Farley, a Senior Lecturer at the University of Kentucky, is on the show today to give us his thoughts on the Iran strikes, airpower in general, and the lessons to be learned from watching the war in Ukraine.
- Should we abolish the independent Air Force?
- Was Israel’s war on Iran a success?
- Has airpower ever forced regime change?
- Curtis LeMay mentioned
- Bombing doesn’t create revolutionary fervor
- Airpower as theater
- “Israel-splaining”
- What’s a Golden Dome for anyway?
- Are FPV drones part of the air force arsenal or infantry weapons?
Strikes on Iran Show the Force, and Limits, of Airpower
Buy Grounded: The Case for Abolishing the United States Air Force
The Five-Ring Circus: How Airpower Enthusiasts Forgot About Interdiction
Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/warcollege.
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.