New York v. New Jersey

Wikipedia · Justia (with opinion) · Docket · oyez.org

Argued on Mar 1, 2023.
Decided on Apr 18, 2023.

Petitioner: New York.
Respondent: New Jersey.

Advocates:

Judith N. Vale (for New York)
Jeremy M. Feigenbaum (for New Jersey)
Austin L. Raynor (for the United States, as amicus curiae, supporting New Jersey)

Facts of the case (from oyez.org)

New York and New Jersey entered into an interstate compact called the Waterfront Commission Compact to fight corruption in the Port of New York and New Jersey. New Jersey then sought to withdraw unilaterally from the compact. New York objected to New Jersey’s withdrawal.

Question

May New Jersey unilaterally withdraw from the Waterfront Commission Compact with New York?

Conclusion

New Jersey may unilaterally withdraw from the 1953 Waterfront Commission Compact. Justice Brett Kavanaugh authored the unanimous opinion of the Court.

The Waterfront Commission Compact does not address unilateral withdrawal. Other principles of law in effect at the time the compact was entered would have informed their understanding of the Compact. One such principle is that a contract that contemplates “continuing performance for an indefinite time is to be interpreted as stipulating only for performance terminable at the will of either party.” Thus, with this understanding, either state may unilaterally withdraw. The principle of state sovereignty further supports this conclusion.

The role of Daoism in 2022 and beyond

Links