Apoorva Mandavilli, a science and global health reporter for the New York Times, dives deep into the lessons we've glossed over since the pandemic. She discusses the alarming public apathy towards rising COVID-19 cases and the emerging threats of bird flu and mpox. Misconceptions about COVID's endemic status and skepticism about vaccines also take center stage. Mandavilli emphasizes the importance of learning from past crises to better prepare for inevitable future pandemics. It's a stirring reminder of the need for vigilance and proactive public health measures.
The podcast underscores a troubling apathy towards vaccination and public health measures as COVID-19 becomes a normalized aspect of life.
It emphasizes the concerning negligence in addressing emerging disease threats like bird flu, compounded by economic pressures and misinformation.
Deep dives
Changing Attitudes Towards COVID-19
Americans' perception of COVID-19 has shifted significantly since the release of the first vaccines. Initially, there was a sense of urgency and dedication to vaccination, with people eagerly seeking out doses and even lying about eligibility to get vaccinated first. However, after almost five years into the pandemic, the response to the latest round of vaccines has been markedly different, characterized by apathy. Many individuals now seem to accept COVID-19 as an inevitable part of life, ignoring the ongoing surge despite the availability of new vaccines and testing programs.
Public Health Response and New Threats
The podcast highlights a concerning lack of urgency in the public health response to emerging disease threats, such as bird flu and MPOCs. Multiple states have reported bird flu cases in cattle, yet there is minimal testing and reporting, leading to significant unknowns about the outbreak's extent. The podcast reveals how economic pressures on farms deter rigorous testing, preventing accurate tracking of infections. Meanwhile, officials seem hesitant to take these issues seriously, underscoring a disturbing trend of negligence in addressing potential public health crises.
Implications of Vaccine Hesitancy
Vaccine hesitancy has become increasingly pronounced, influenced by the politicization of public health measures and misinformation about vaccine safety. Despite the successful rollout of vaccines during the initial pandemic response, many Americans now perceive greater risk in vaccination than in contracting the virus. This skepticism is compounded by the financial barriers for uninsured individuals, who face costs for new vaccines that were previously free. As misconceptions about vaccination persist, public health officials are challenged to rebuild trust and promote protective measures effectively.
Rather than coming out of the pandemic with a new toolkit of public health measures or even personal habits, the response to this summer’s long wave of COVID infections has mostly been to continue with business as usual. But business as usual seems inadequate with mpox and bird flu crises on the horizon.
Want more What Next? Subscribe to Slate Plus to access ad-free listening to the whole What Next family and across all your favorite Slate podcasts. Subscribe today on Apple Podcasts by clicking “Try Free” at the top of our show page. Sign up now at slate.com/whatnextplus to get access wherever you listen.
Podcast production by Elena Schwartz, Paige Osburn, Anna Phillips, Madeline Ducharme and Rob Gunther.