Ep 161 Questions on Time, Physics, Creeds, Trinity, and More
Nov 13, 2024
auto_awesome
Dive into a playful exploration of divine simplicity across religions and the intriguing relationship between modern physics and theology. Discover the clash of presentism and special relativity as it intersects with essential doctrines of the Presbyterian Church. Enjoy lighthearted banter about contrasting worship styles and amusing anecdotes featuring a cookie-loving cat named Constantine. Finally, engage with critiques of social Trinitarianism while unraveling the complexities of contemporary theological debates.
The discussion highlights how Shankara's philosophy in Hinduism navigates metaphysical complexities of divine simplicity differently than Trinitarian Christianity faces with its doctrinal challenges.
Critiques of social Trinitarianism reveal misunderstandings within contemporary scholarship, as key figures emphatically reject politically charged interpretations previously associated with their views.
Deep dives
Hindu Proponents of Divine Simplicity
The episode addresses the question of whether proponents of divine simplicity in Hinduism face challenges similar to those of Trinitarian Christians, compared to the more straightforward monotheism of Judaism and Islam. It discusses Shankara, a significant Hindu philosopher, who posits that all perceived diversity in the universe is illusory, asserting that ultimate reality is fundamentally simple and identical to God. This perspective allows Shankara to sidestep the complexities that arise for Trinitarians, as his philosophy treats the multiplicity of forms as mere illusion, thereby simplifying metaphysical concerns. Ultimately, the belief in divine simplicity within Hinduism operates on a radically different level than in Christian contexts, where the complexity of the Trinity raises unique challenges and critiques from monotheistic perspectives.
Clarifying Thomas Torrance's Views on Time
A discussion arises regarding the theological intricacies of Thomas Torrance's writings, particularly his views on time and space in relation to Christ's incarnation. The speaker reflects on their early engagement with Torrance's works, acknowledging a shift in perspective as they gained a deeper understanding of philosophy. They criticize Torrance for presenting confusing ideas about God's relationship to time, particularly his claims about God existing without succession while also positing new moments in God's narrative. This critique highlights a broader concern regarding clarity and coherence in theological writings, especially when addressing complex topics like time and incarnation.
Social Trinitarianism and Its Critiques
The episode explores the concept of social Trinitarianism, addressing critiques levied by Matthew Barrett against contemporary interpretations of the doctrine. It highlights the speaker's frustrations with Barrett’s scholarship, noting that significant figures in social Trinitarianism have already distanced their views from political implications or social agendas that Barrett seems to associate with them. Furthermore, the discussion points out that critiques of divine simplicity are often misapplied since many social Trinitarians openly reject that notion. By underscoring the disconnect between Barrett's critiques and the current scholarly landscape, the conversation emphasizes the evolution of Trinitarian thought away from its politicized interpretations.
In today’s episode, I open up the mailbag to consider more listener questions. We have questions on physics and time. We have questions on the creeds and Hinduism. We have several questions about the doctrine of the Trinity. And we have people asking about my denominational background.
Credits
Host: R.T. Mullins (PhD, University of St Andrews; Dr. Habil. University of Helsinki) is a lecturer and researcher at the University of Lucerne, a visiting professor of philosophy at Palm Beach Atlantic University, and a docent of dogmatics at the University of Helsinki.
Music by Rockandmetal_domination – Raising-questions.