Dan Ariely, Professor Ariely talks about what makes rational people believe irrational things. Topics include: stress as a catalyst for misbeliefs, the complexity of stories, the role of social forces in sealing the deal, how social media violates communication standards, and potential actions to counteract misbelief.
Stress serves as a breeding ground for misbelief formation, providing a sense of control and assigning blame to others.
Social media platforms violate traditional communication norms, fostering overtrust and the persistence of misbelief communities.
Deep dives
The Impact of Misbelief and Understanding Differences
In this podcast episode, Professor Dan Ariely discusses his new book 'Misbelief' and explores the phenomenon of people holding irrational beliefs. He highlights the question of why people with similar backgrounds and perspectives can develop such contrasting viewpoints over time. Professor Ariely shares his personal experience of being targeted by conspiracy theories and the struggles of debunking false narratives. He emphasizes the importance of not discounting misbelievers and their ideas, as they serve a real psychological need. Unpacking the factors that contribute to misbelief, such as stress and the desire for complex narratives, he discusses the cognitive, personality, and social aspects at play. In particular, he notes the role of social media in perpetuating misbelief and disrupting traditional communication norms. While solutions to this issue are complex, Professor Ariely suggests approaches involving empathy, resilience, and a balance of humility and conviction in engaging with misbelievers.
The Role of Stress in Misbelief Formation
Stress serves as a breeding ground for misbelief formation. Professor Ariely explains how stress from unpredictable situations triggers a need for explanations and narratives that provide a sense of control and relief. He highlights the tendency for people to adopt misbeliefs that assign blame to others, creating villains as an external source of responsibility. The adoption of complex stories also gives individuals a false sense of understanding and control over the chaotic world. Stressful environments, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, further amplify the likelihood of misbelief adoption. By understanding the psychology behind stress-induced misbelief, we can address the underlying factors to mitigate its impact.
Social Factors and Misbelief Reinforcement
Professor Ariely delves into the social elements that contribute to the reinforcement and persistence of misbelief. He uncovers how misbelievers seek out like-minded communities on social media platforms, where they find support and validation for their beliefs. These communities serve as a comfortable space where individuals who have felt rejected by society can belong, participate, and gain social currency. Professor Ariely highlights how cognitive dissonance reinforces misbelief adoption once individuals engage actively in sharing videos, signing petitions, or joining demonstrations. The social element amplifies the difficulty of changing misbeliefs and navigating the funnel of misbelief.
The Challenges of Social Media and Communication in the Misbelief Era
Professor Ariely explores how social media platforms violate traditional laws of communication. He discusses how online interactions lack trustworthiness due to the absence of true signals present in offline communication. Social media leverages engagement rather than truth and fosters overtrust from individuals in a system not designed for trustworthy information. The rise of conspiracy theories and misbelief on social media reveals the need for changes in these platforms to promote accurate information sharing. Professor Ariely emphasizes the importance of recognizing the clash between evolved communication mechanisms and the current state of online communication, urging a focus on resilience and cognitive approaches to navigate the challenges of the misbelief era.