

Episode 803: A Burning Question
27 snips Aug 28, 2025
The conversation dives into Trump's controversial firing of Lisa Cook and implications for the Federal Reserve. They tackle the legality of flag burning as a free speech issue, spurred by recent political actions. The group discusses the media's responsibility in reporting violent incidents and the cycle of imitation in mass shootings. Additionally, they reflect on personal experiences and cultural moments, from engagement news to the ups and downs of baseball season, highlighting the emotional investment of fans.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Pretextual Fed Removal Signals Political Control
- Trump moved to remove Lisa Cook citing mortgage-residence questions as a pretext for political control of the Fed.
- The panel sees this as part of a broader effort to exert influence over monetary policy and appointments.
Fed Independence Is Constitutionally Ambiguous
- The Federal Reserve sits in a constitutionally ambiguous place: independent yet part of the executive framework.
- MBD warns that tradition preserved Fed independence, but Trump will likely push and exploit that ambiguity.
Originalism Points To Presidential Removal Power
- Charlie Cooke argues originalism points toward strong presidential removal power, even over the Fed.
- He accepts the Fed's practical value but calls its current structure unconstitutional absent an amendment.