Bulwark Takes WOW: Trump’s Stupid NYT Suit Gets a Legal SWIRLY
Sep 20, 2025
Tim Miller and Sam Stein dive into a judge's stinging dismissal of Trump's lawsuit against The New York Times, showcasing the court's sharp wit and legal acumen. They explore the implications of Trump's bizarre claim that negative press should be outlawed, linking it to concerns about self-censorship in media. The hosts brilliantly dissect how this case reflects broader issues of free speech and accountability in journalism, all while serving up humor and sharp commentary.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Judge Eviscerates Frivolous Lawsuit
- The court thoroughly rejected Trump's libel-style complaint as rambling PR, not a legal claim.
- Judge Stephen Menendez (Meridae) mocked the filing's florid language and refused to treat it as serious litigation.
Reading The Judge's Withering Lines
- Sam and Tim read and mock the judge's colorful lines about complaints not being a public forum.
- They compare the judge's language to Hyde Park Speakers' Corner and laugh at the filing's PR tone.
Judges Use Wit As A Legal Deterrent
- The hosts suspect judges are having fun shaming frivolous filings to deter them.
- They note judges insert colorful language to publicly reprimand and discourage meritless suits.