

Uncommon Knowledge Archive: Oppenheimer’s Edward Teller and Sid Drell on ICBM Defense Systems | Uncommon Knowledge | Peter Robinson | Hoover Institution
Jan 30, 2024
Edward Teller, a nuclear physicist and key figure in Oppenheimer, and Sidney Drell, a nuclear arms control expert, debate the necessity and regulations of nuclear weapons in the late 20th century. They discuss President Reagan's defense systems proposal, the wastefulness of his defense program, and the complexities of developing and implementing a defense system. Former CIA Director James Woolsey joins them to emphasize the importance of missile defense against threats to allies and terrorism.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
SDI's Initial Aim and Teller's Support
- SDI's initial aim was to defend the US against a massive Soviet missile attack.
- Teller supported SDI due to the potential of non-nuclear defense through accurate collision technology.
SDI Program Cost and Drell's Criticism
- Reagan's SDI program cost around $40 billion and aimed to deploy a system by a specific date.
- Drell criticized this approach, advocating for research-focused development instead of premature deployment.
Assessment of the Threat
- The Clinton administration believed only Russia and China posed an immediate ICBM threat.
- They projected a decade before other nations developed similar capabilities, excluding potential shorter-range threats from North Korea.