The podcast explores the dangers of centralized cloud storage and the control that tech giants have over our data. It discusses the risks of data centralization, including lack of control and potential censorship. The podcast also highlights the importance of decentralized storage in achieving a user-centric web and preserving digital evidence.
14:15
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
auto_awesome
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
Centralization of data storage by a few companies puts our data at risk of loss and censorship.
Decentralized storage options offer increased control, reduced censorship risk, and enhanced data security.
Deep dives
The Problem of Centralized Data Storage
Cloud storage providers have become the dominant custodians of our data, leading to centralization and potential risks. A handful of companies, such as Amazon, Microsoft, and Google, control the majority of the world's data, creating single points of failure. This concentration of power not only puts our data at risk of loss or accidental removal, but also makes censorship easier. Governments can exert control over centralized data storage, leading to restricted access and potential manipulation of information.
The Emergence of Decentralized Storage
Web 3.0 technologies enable the shift towards decentralized storage options, offering alternatives to centralized platforms. Decentralized storage distributes data across multiple participants, eliminating single points of control and failure. This approach ensures persistence and resilience in storing important records and allows individuals to maintain ownership and control over their data. Emerging decentralized storage platforms such as Rweave, SIA, Storage STORJ, IPFS, and Filecoin offer users greater control, reduced risk of censorship, and increased data security.
Use Cases and Impacts of Decentralized Storage
Decentralized storage platforms are already being utilized in various sectors. Filecoin, the largest decentralized storage network, stores critical information including government data, evidence of human rights abuses, and scientific datasets. Journalists and media organizations are exploring decentralized storage for secure document exchange and preservation of investigative materials. The case study of Rolling Stone's war crimes investigation in Bosnia demonstrates the importance and effectiveness of decentralized storage in preserving evidence and ensuring accountability. The adoption of decentralized storage not only enhances data robustness and security but also moves towards a user-centric internet where control and power are distributed among users.
We put a lot of trust in cloud storage providers, presuming that they’ll keep our data safe. But what if they're hacked? Or their servers go down? Or what if they decide to just kick us out of our accounts, and we lose all our emails, files, contacts, photos... There's another big problem with centralizing all our storage on a single platform: it turns out the whole world is doing it. Most of the world's data is stored by just 3 companies: Amazon, Microsoft, and Google.
In this video we’re going to talk about how a handful of companies came to control most of the world’s data, how this could put our data in danger and make censorship easier, and we’ll explore the new world of decentralized storage, allowing control of the internet to be distributed back to individuals.
00:00 The BIG problem with Cloud Storage 02:11 The Move Towards Centralized Storage 04:13 Risks of Data Centralization 07:40 Decentralized Storage Options 10:27 The DJ and the War Crimes 11:44 Conclusion 13:19 WTF
We need to make sure that we are protecting our from loss and censorship. Decentralized storage allows us to return to the ideals of the early internet, that promised a connected world where information flows freely.
Special Thanks to Adam Rose and Matt Hamilton for lending their time and expertise!
Brought to you by NBTV team members: Lee Rennie, Cube Boy, Sam Ettaro, Will Sandoval and Naomi Brockwell