Cultish Ostlerian Mormonism: Mormon Philosopher vs. Mormon Prophets
May 7, 2025
Aaron Shafavoloff, an associate with Mormonism Research Ministry and a dedicated critic of Mormon apologetics, teams up with Skylar Hamilton, a former Mormon and host of the Distinctive Christianity podcast. They dive into the complexities of Mormon theology, discussing the King Follett discourse and the contrasts between traditional and Oslerian beliefs. Topics include the Adam-God doctrine, evolving interpretations of divinity, and the implications of cognitive dissonance in faith. Their insights spark a lively debate on prophetic authority versus philosophical interpretations in modern Mormonism.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
Classic Mormonism's Core Teachings
- Classic Mormonism is defined by the King Follett discourse, teaching eternal progression and God becoming God.
- It promotes a plurality of gods and an infinite regress of deities above God the Father.
Mormon Doctrine Ambiguity
- Mormonism lacks a clear, consistent doctrine, creating ambiguity in teachings and beliefs.
- This ambiguity allows philosophers like Blake Osler to reinterpret Mormon doctrine independently of official authority.
Blake Osler's Personal Journey
- Blake Osler began questioning Mormon doctrines like macroevolution early in life, finding conflicts with LDS leaders' views.
- He decided to forge his own path, leading to his reinterpretation of Mormonism that challenges established prophetic teachings.
