It's so over: Sam Bankman-Fried testifies (feat. Sam Kessler)
Oct 30, 2023
auto_awesome
Cryptocurrency entrepreneur Sam Bankman-Fried testifies in the trial. Topics discussed include liquidity of exchanges, defense strategy, implementation of 'allow negative' feature, credibility of testimony, and reflections on the trial experience.
The defense's attempt to present data analysis as evidence was met with skepticism by the jury, questioning the credibility of the analysis.
Sam's defense strategy suffered a blow as his testimony contradicted previous witnesses and raised doubts about his credibility.
Deep dives
Testimony of Expert Witness Joseph Pimbly
Joseph Pimbly was hired by Sam's defense team as a data analyst to assemble documents showing that Alameda liquidity and FTX liquidity was at a certain level over the course of 2021 through 2022. However, his presentation of these documents did not seem to sway the jury and he faced extensive questioning from the prosecution about the source of the data and the credibility of the analysis.
Testimony of Crystal Roll
Crystal Roll, an attorney working for Sam, testified about her role in accompanying Sam when he met with the Securities Commission of the Bahamas. She aimed to corroborate the timeline and substance of these meetings, emphasizing that Sam's compliance with the Bahamas' requests was essential to avoid severe penalties. However, the prosecution attacked her credibility and highlighted that her involvement was after the collapse, reducing the significance of her testimony.
Evidentiary Hearing: Advice of Counsel Defense
An evidentiary hearing, resembling a mock trial, was held to determine the admissibility of the advice of counsel defense. Sam was questioned under oath by his lawyers and the prosecution, revealing that Daniel Friedberg provided advice on document retention. However, much of Sam's testimony seemed contradictory to previous testimonies, potentially undermining his defense strategy.
Sam Bankman Fried's Testimony
During his testimony, Sam tried to present himself as an advisor rather than a boss, shifting responsibility onto his deputies. He mentioned the Alameda liquidity hole, but claimed he only became aware of it a month before the collapse. However, this conflicted with previous witnesses' testimonies. Sam's credibility was also challenged due to discrepancies in timelines and previous comments made about Alameda's purpose. The response to his testimony from the court audience suggests that the case is not going well for Sam.
Bennett and Cas are joined by Sam Kessler from CoinDesk to discuss the witnesses that the defense has been calling to the stand, including Sam Bankman-Fried.