(Classic Episode) Jon Askonas: Politics is Downstream of Technology
Sep 4, 2023
auto_awesome
Jon Askonas, professor at The Catholic University of America and a contributor to the New Atlantis and Compact, discusses technological change, conservatism's vulnerability to grift, democracy, the January 6th hearings, Rene Girard, and apocalypse.
Conservatism's blind spot towards the impact of technology makes it inherently revolutionary.
Conservative aesthetics focus on nostalgia but lack substance and revival of underlying practices and virtues.
The rise of niche communities and personalized ideologies through social media algorithms has shifted policy influence away from traditional democratic processes.
Deep dives
Conservatism as a Revolutionary Ideology
Modern conservatism is considered a revolutionary ideology because it focuses on ideology and ignores the impact of technology on society. This blind spot prevents conservatives from recognizing and addressing the material changes brought about by technological advancements, making conservatism inherently revolutionary in nature.
The Shift in Technology and Conservative Aesthetics
In the current media environment, there is a shift in how people perceive libertarianism as an inoffensive ideology. Conservative aesthetics, often driven by nostalgia and prestige, create a mere veneer of the way things used to be. However, this focus on aesthetics does not revive the practices and virtues underlying those aesthetics, ultimately rendering it meaningless.
Technology's Impact on Democracy and Policy Changes
The advent of the internet and digital technologies has transformed the way information is disseminated and how people engage with politics. The shift from one-to-many communications to many-to-many communications through social media algorithms has led to the rise of niche communities and personalized ideologies. This has resulted in policy changes being influenced by highly motivated minority groups rather than traditional democratic processes.
Apocalyptic Thinking and the Internet Age
In the age of the internet, people's views on the apocalypse have changed. The belief in the value of human cognition and cognitive food chain has become prevalent, leading to anxiety about artificial intelligence and technology surpassing human capabilities. However, this view neglects the complex interplay between humans and technology, and the intertwining of human and artificial intelligence systems.
Media Strategy and Salience
Media strategy plays a crucial role in shaping narratives and influencing public perception. The podcast discusses how different media approaches can impact the salience of certain issues. It explores examples such as the January 6th hearings and the role of Tucker Carlson in boosting narratives. The dynamics of the media landscape have shifted, making it harder to create a unified narrative that resonates with everyone. However, more diverse ways of thinking and storytelling are emerging, allowing for the amplification of different perspectives.
Balancing Order and Chaos
The podcast also delves into the concepts of order and chaos in different contexts. It suggests that political thinking in areas like election strategy could benefit from more chaos and experimentation, moving away from repetitive and predictable approaches. On the other hand, urban planning, specifically in American cities, is seen as having too much chaos in the form of inefficient zoning regulations. The call is made for more order and thoughtful design in urban development to create healthier and more sustainable cities.
Jon Askonas is a professor at The Catholic University of America and a contributor to the New Atlantis and Compact. We discuss technological change, Marshall McLuhan, why conservatism is prone to grift, Democracy, the January 6th hearings, Rene Girard, and apocalypse.