Investigative team members uncover the true cost of the HS2 rail project, revealing misleading information, whistleblower negligence, and the destruction of documents. The podcast explores the consequences faced by whistleblowers and the calls for a public inquiry into the hidden costs of HS2.
HS2 Limited misled about true costs and downplayed risks, while whistleblowers were dismissed or sacked.
Parliament was misled about the true costs, with outdated figures quoted and estimates almost double the original budget.
Deep dives
HS2 misleading about true costs and downplayed risks
The investigation reveals that HS2 Limited was misleading about the true costs of the project and downplayed the risks involved. Whistleblowers within HS2 tried to raise concerns about the underestimated costs and the guarantees of profits for contractors, even if they delivered late and over budget. However, their warnings were ignored, and some were even dismissed or sacked. The report also highlights the deliberate shredding of key reports and documents that exposed the discrepancies. The revelations show a pattern of cover-up and a failure to disclose the accurate costs of the project to Parliament and the public.
HS2 over budget and timeline misled Parliament
Despite clear warnings and evidence pointing to HS2 going significantly over budget and missing its timeline, Parliament was misled about the project's true costs. The Transport Secretary at the time, Chris Grayling, continued to quote an outdated and incorrect figure of £2.8 billion for the property purchasing costs in phase one of the project. Reports estimated that the project costs would go up to £80 billion, almost double the original budget. The revelations raise questions about the transparency and accuracy of information provided to Parliament and the decision to proceed with HS2 despite the warnings.
Whistleblowers faced retaliation and cover-up
The whistleblowers within HS2 faced retaliation and attempts to cover up their concerns. Stephen Cresswell, a cost analyst, was sacked after raising concerns about manipulated costs and recording conversations with colleagues to gather evidence. Another whistleblower, Doug Thornton, discovered discrepancies in property cost estimates and was instructed to shred key reports. These actions showcase a culture of suppressing dissent and withholding crucial information that could have exposed the true costs and risks of HS2. The treatment of whistleblowers raises serious ethical and accountability concerns within the project.
Calls for a public inquiry into HS2 mismanagement
Following the revelations of misleading information and cover-up within HS2, there are growing calls for a public inquiry into the mismanagement of the project. Professor Stephen Glaister, an advisor to the government on HS2, emphasizes the need for a thorough investigation to prevent similar situations in the future. The public inquiry would aim to uncover the root causes of the mismanagement, identify accountability, and recommend measures to ensure transparency and accurate reporting in large-scale projects. The HS2 scandal underscores the urgent need for improved oversight and governance in major infrastructure undertakings.
As the cost began to spiral, HS2 bosses allegedly shredded documents, sacked whistleblowers and used misleading projections to keep the scheme alive and the cash coming. We speak to the team behind a new investigation into the beleaguered rail project, and hear one whistleblower’s secret recordings. HS2 Ltd denies any wrongdoing.
This podcast was brought to you thanks to the support of readers of The Times and The Sunday Times. Subscribe today: thetimes.co.uk/storiesofourtimes.
Guests:
- Jonathan Calvert, Insight Editor, The Sunday Times.
- George Arbuthnott, Deputy Insight Editor, The Sunday Times.