Marriner Eccles: Reform “may not have happened in 1935 if Eccles hadn't been there”
Aug 6, 2024
auto_awesome
Marriner Eccles was a pivotal figure in shaping the US Federal Reserve's approach to economic policy, serving as its Chair from 1934 to 1948. This discussion highlights his advocacy for macroeconomic activism, emphasizing the importance of government intervention for financial security. Eccles's transformation from a traditional Republican to a Keynesian advocate is explored, showcasing how personal experiences influenced his economic beliefs. The podcast also delves into the significant impact of the Banking Act of 1935, underscoring Eccles's role in navigating the complexities of the New Deal.
Marriner Eccles transformed the Federal Reserve by prioritizing fiscal policy, emphasizing government intervention for economic recovery over traditional monetary strategies.
His advocacy for macroeconomic activism reflected a commitment to social justice, highlighting the importance of decent housing and equal education for all Americans.
The Banking Act of 1935, largely influenced by Eccles, restructured the Fed, centralizing power and enabling a more proactive approach to monetary policy.
Deep dives
Mariner Eccles' Legacy in Economic Policy
Mariner Eccles significantly influenced the shift toward macroeconomic activism in U.S. economic policy. He advocated for the use of fiscal and monetary policies to ensure that the basic rights of Americans were transformed from ideals into reality, emphasizing decent housing, adequate medical care, equal education, and financial security. This perspective supported the Federal Reserve's dual mandate of stable prices and full employment, framing government intervention as essential in achieving these goals. Such a comprehensive vision extended beyond mere employment, reflecting a broader commitment to social justice and economic equality.
Eccles' Emphasis on Fiscal Policy Over Monetary Policy
Eccles, from the beginning of his tenure at the Federal Reserve, prioritized fiscal policies over traditional monetary strategies, insisting that government spending was critical for economic recovery. His early memos to President Roosevelt focused on the need for immediate public spending rather than monetary controls, reflecting his belief that addressing aggregate demand was paramount during economic crises. In a stark contrast to his contemporaries, Eccles believed that the government's role was to actively stimulate the economy, a sentiment echoed during the Great Recession. His position gained renewed recognition as modern economists increasingly validated his arguments about fiscal policy's importance in recessions.
Eccles' Entrepreneurial Origins and Radical Transformation
Mariner Eccles' journey from a struggling family in Glasgow to a successful businessman shaped his unique perspective on economic policy. His early experiences instilled a deep understanding of the challenges faced by everyday Americans, and the stark realities of the Great Depression prompted a shift from his conservative upbringing to a more radical New Deal ideology. Despite his traditional Republican roots, the economic turmoil led him to advocate for expansive government fiscal intervention. This transformation highlights the intrinsic connection between personal experience and public policy advocacy, illustrating how real-world challenges can reformulate beliefs and practices in economic governance.
Eccles and the Housing Market Revolution
One of Eccles' pivotal contributions was his drive to reform the American housing market through innovative policies aimed at facilitating home ownership. He consistently pointed to the successes of housing initiatives in other countries, arguing that the U.S. needed to match these efforts to combat the economic downturn effectively. Despite his advocacy, many of his ambitious housing plans, including substantial reforms in mortgage structures, faced significant delays and resistance from within the administration. Eccles believed that had these measures been implemented sooner, the country could have achieved a faster economic recovery and substantial growth during the Depression.
The Impact of Eccles on Federal Reserve Structure
The Banking Act of 1935 marked a significant overhaul of the Federal Reserve's structure, in which Eccles played an instrumental role, advocating for a shift of power from individual banks to a more centralized board. This reform underpinned his broader vision of an active central bank that could influence economic conditions through both traditional monetary policy and innovative fiscal efforts. Despite tensions with Treasury Secretary Henry Morgenthau, Eccles maintained his position on the necessity of fiscal action, demonstrating an enduring commitment to his principles even against political pressures. His reforms transformed the Fed into a more proactive institution, illustrating his lasting legacy in shaping modern central banking practices.
More than any other global institution, the US Federal Reserve’s decisions and communications drive capital markets and alter financial conditions everywhere from Seattle to Seoul. While its interest rate are set by an expert committee, for almost a century, the Fed’s core philosophy and operational approach have been moulded by one person: the Chair of the Board of Governors.
In this podcast series, Tim Gwynn Jones - a veteran central bank "watcher" - talks to authors of books about the Fed's most influential Chairs, starting with Marriner Eccles, Bill Martin, Arthur Burns, and Paul Volcker.
In this first episode, he interviews Mark Nelson - author of Jumping the Abyss: Marriner S. Eccles and the New Deal, 1933-1940 (University of Utah Press, 2017). Eccles chaired the Fed from 1934 to 1948, turned it into a Washington power centre, and centralised policymaking with the Board of Governors.
The US might have been better served if Eccles and his nemesis Henry Morgenthau, the Treasury Secretary from 1934-1945, had swapped roles, says Nelson. "That's true except for the fact that Eccles did do something very important at the Fed and that is the Banking Act of 1935, which really changed the Fed in an enormously important way and Morgenthau would not have done that ... I think it would have happened at some point. You could make the argument, though, that it may not have happened in 1935 if Eccles hadn't been there because Eccles took the job at the Fed on the understanding that these changes would be made”.
An actor-turned-historian, Mark Nelson was educated at Pepperdine University and Claremont Graduate University and today teaches at Greenville Technical College, South Carolina. His next book will be Race and Recovery: James F. Byrnes and the New Deal.