The federal judiciary is increasingly confronted with constitutional crises stemming from the Trump administration's refusal to comply with court orders and due process.
Emerging personhood laws represent a significant threat to reproductive rights by potentially criminalizing abortion and redefining legal protections for reproductive health.
Public engagement and grassroots activism are essential to challenge the current political climate and safeguard reproductive freedoms amidst intensifying legal and social pressures.
Deep dives
Developments in High-Stakes Legal Cases
Recent discussions focus on significant legal developments surrounding high-stakes cases related to rendition flights to El Salvador. Two major cases involve Kilmar Abrego Garcia, who remains imprisoned overseas, and Judge James Bosberg’s courtroom where the clash between Articles 2 and 3 of the Constitution plays out. Notably, Judge Bosberg has found probable cause for criminal contempt against Trump administration officials who failed to comply with court orders regarding the deportation of Venezuelan migrants. The implications of these cases signal a concerning trend regarding the respect for due process and the government's obligation to adhere to judicial rulings.
Escalating Threats to Reproductive Rights
The push for fetal personhood in American law is gaining momentum, representing a critical threat to reproductive freedoms following the end of Roe v. Wade. Legal attempts to establish personhood laws are viewed as a key strategy by anti-abortion advocates, aiming to redefine legal protections in ways that could lead to criminalization of abortion and other reproductive health decisions. This escalatory narrative parallels historical patterns of resistance against reproductive rights, where the gradual erosion of rights culminated in significant legal and social ramifications. Individuals and legal experts express deep concern over the future of reproductive healthcare in the U.S. as these personhood efforts gain traction.
Judicial Responses and Activism
Judicial responses to recent legal challenges reveal a divided landscape regarding reproductive rights and personhood issues. Judges have demonstrated varying degrees of resistance to governmental overreach, with some courts explicitly rejecting attempts to bypass due process. The conflicting interpretations of what constitutes compliance with court orders emphasize the ongoing struggle between judicial authority and executive actions. As these legal battles unfold, they highlight the importance of maintaining respect for constitutional principles amidst intensifying political pressures surrounding reproductive health.
Impacts of Political Climate on Healthcare
The current political climate is profoundly affecting healthcare access, particularly for pregnant individuals and families seeking reproductive care. The erosion of clear legal protections following the overturning of Roe has led to instances where maternal health is jeopardized, resulting in pregnant individuals being denied critical medical services. Civil rights advocates warn of the broader ramifications of restrictive laws on healthcare providers, who are increasingly reluctant to offer necessary care due to fears of legal repercussions. This raises alarming questions about the future of healthcare in states with draconian abortion laws and the normalization of punitive measures against those seeking reproductive care.
The Role of Public Pressure and Activism
Public pressure continues to emerge as a pivotal factor in the discourse around reproductive rights and legislative actions. Activists emphasize the need for collective action to challenge the status quo while stressing that public engagement can sway political outcomes. There is an urgent call for greater awareness and mobilization among citizens to demand accountability and protect reproductive freedoms amidst a conservative backlash. While the future of reproductive rights remains uncertain, the involvement of the public and grassroots movements is seen as crucial for advocating for equitable healthcare access and pushing back against restrictive legislation.
Ever since March 15, when three flights carrying hundreds of men who had been afforded zero due process left United States airspace and landed in El Salvador, American democracy has been hurtling toward an internal conflict that the federal judiciary would very much prefer to avoid, but just keeps getting more unavoidable. On this week’s Amicus podcast, Mark Joseph Stern is joined by Leah Litman for the first half of the show. They discuss how, faced with a Trump administration that claims the ability to rewrite the Constitution on the fly, denies the ability to follow court orders, and dangles the possibility of extending its lawlessness to renditioning American citizens to a foreign prison, the federal judiciary this week did what the Supreme Court failed to do last week: explicitly call out the regime’s lawless actions. Aptly, Leah’s new book, Lawless: How the Supreme Court Runs on Conservative Grievance, Fringe Theories, and Bad Vibes, comes out on May 13 and they discuss how the highest court’s enabling of Trump and MAGA more broadly has brought us to the constitutional precipice.
Next: In the six months since the re-election of Donald Trump, abortion and reproductive rights have been squished way below the fold, news-wise, obscured by an ever-mounting pile of terrifying headlines. But outside of the public glare, the legal landscape of reproductive rights has been shifting. Dahlia Lithwick talks to Mary Ziegler about her book Personhood: The New Civil War Over Reproduction. Together, they examine how notions of fetal and embryonic personhood are fueling punitive actions against women, physicians, and those who provide or seek healthcare related to reproduction.
Want more Amicus? Join Slate Plus to unlock weekly bonus episodes with exclusive legal analysis. Plus, you’ll access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. You can subscribe directly from the Amicus show page on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Or, visit slate.com/amicusplus to get access wherever you listen.
