

Is the Trump-Starmer trade deal really "historic"?
65 snips May 8, 2025
In this enlightening discussion, Jeffrey Goldberg, editor-in-chief of The Atlantic, weighs in on the newly unveiled US-UK trade deal amidst the backdrop of VE Day, highlighting its historical significance. The conversation dives into whether the deal truly benefits Britain or merely serves political optics for Trump and Starmer. Goldberg also shares insights into the unpredictable nature of American politics, the complexities of interviewing Trump, and the challenges journalists face in maintaining integrity in a politically charged environment.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
Trade Deal: Sector-Focused, Partial
- The US-UK trade deal focuses on specific sectors by reducing tariffs on cars and metals rather than being a comprehensive free trade agreement.
- It partially reverses tariffs Trump introduced recently without addressing digital services tax or broad trade liberalization.
Politics Trump Starmer Trade Deal
- The political implications of the US-UK deal outweigh economic benefits, providing a much-needed win for both Trump and Starmer.
- Trump can portray the deal as a success of his tariff strategy while Starmer gains political capital amid domestic challenges.
Starmer-Trump Political Tension
- Starmer's close association with Trump in the trade deal contrasts with his progressive voter base's dislike of Trump.
- This alignment may create political tension but frames Starmer as securing a valuable trade agreement.