James Griffiths, The Globe's Asia Correspondent, discusses the new national security law in Hong Kong, known as Article 23, its impact on protests and human rights. The law includes offenses related to sedition, treason, and state secrets, raising concerns about freedom of speech. Griffiths explores the broad reach of the law and the risks faced by journalists in Hong Kong.
Article 23 broadens sedition definition, impacting Hong Kong individuals severely.
Journalists in Hong Kong face heightened risks under broadly defined state secrets in Article 23.
Deep dives
Impact of the National Security Law on Protests in Hong Kong
The 2019 protests in Hong Kong, arising from opposition to an extradition bill with China, evolved into a broader pro-democracy movement against police brutality. Due to the protests, an estimated two million people took to the streets, leading to the eventual imposition of a 2020 national security law by Beijing. Subsequently, a new law, Article 23, aimed at rooting out seditious activity, received a limited public reaction. The restrictions now in place in Hong Kong prevent mass protests.
Broad Scope and Stringency of Article 23 Law
Article 23, with roots in the Hong Kong Basic Law, extends beyond sedition to include a range of offenses with severe penalties, significantly impacting individuals in Hong Kong. Compared to Western democracies, the legislation broadens the definition of sedition, resulting in harsh penalties for relatively minor acts. Individuals could face charges under this law for actions that would not typically be prosecutable in other democratic nations.
Concerns for Journalists Under Article 23
Journalists in Hong Kong face heightened risks under Article 23, with concerns over the broadly defined state secrets and external forces clauses. The legislation poses challenges for quoting overseas critics, involvement with foreign-funded media, and coverage that may be deemed seditious. Potential penalties, including lengthy imprisonment, raise fears among journalists, particularly those affiliated with foreign-funded media organizations.
The government in Hong Kong recently voted to pass a new national security law, referred to as Article 23. It includes seven new offences related to sedition, treason and state secrets, and is expected to have a chilling effect on protest. A number of countries, including Canada, denounced the law before it was passed, saying it’s too broad and risks undermining human rights.
James Griffiths, The Globe’s Asia Correspondent, is on the show to discuss Article 23 – what it is, how it’s affecting people in Hong Kong and who is most at risk.