Caitlin Long, CEO of Custodia Bank and a champion of financial innovation, discusses how Federal Reserve policies hinder progress in the banking sector. Joined by Jack Solowey from Cato, they delve into Operation Chokepoint 2.0, highlighting how banks face regulatory challenges that stifle innovation. They explore the Fed's protective stance towards incumbents and the stark differences between state and federal banking regulations. The conversation emphasizes the urgent need for a balanced approach to foster a more innovative financial landscape.
The Federal Reserve's increased discretion over bank access undermines competition and hinders financial innovation, particularly affecting state-chartered entities.
Regulatory discretion and lack of transparency threaten trust in the financial system, demanding a framework that encourages innovation without overreach.
Deep dives
Federal Reserve's Expanding Control
The Federal Reserve has significantly expanded its authority over the payment system in the United States, moving from a straightforward granting of master account access to a more discretionary process. This shift is seen as a method to control access and protect incumbent banks from emerging financial innovators, particularly state-chartered entities. Historically, the Federal Reserve allowed equal access for both state and nationally chartered banks, as mandated by the Monetary Control Act of 1980, which deemed the payment system a public good essential for maintaining competition. However, the Fed's recent changes undermine this mandate, raising concerns about anti-competitive practices and the restriction of financial innovation.
Innovation Under Threat
New technologies are driving rapid innovation in the financial sector, but the Federal Reserve's protective measures threaten to stifle these advancements. The podcast discusses how state-chartered banks have been the source of significant innovations, often acting as laboratories for financial solutions that benefit consumers. The increasing speed of financial technology contrasts sharply with the slower pace of traditional banking, leading to a growing gap that consumers find increasingly frustrating. As a result, entrepreneurs in the fintech space are exploring alternatives outside the heavily regulated banking sector, potentially diminishing the relevance of traditional banking institutions.
Regulatory Discretion and Its Implications
Central to the discussion is the issue of regulatory discretion, wherein regulators can arbitrarily block or deny access to the payment system based on subjective criteria rather than established laws. This lack of transparency and accountability erodes trust in the regulatory framework and disincentivizes innovation. The podcast suggests that reducing regulatory discretion is essential for fostering a fair and competitive financial environment, one where innovations can develop without undue interference from federal authorities. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the need for a regulatory landscape that supports startups and entrepreneurs, ensuring that any restrictions imposed are justified and conducive to fostering competition.
When the Federal Reserve uses a ministerial task to punish financial innovation, what's a bank to do? Take them to court, for one. Caitlin Long is CEO of Custodia Bank. She and Cato's Jack Solowey detail how and why the Fed is cracking down on innovators.