Legal expert Lawrence Lessig outlines our plan to fight back against SuperPACs. He discusses the logical mistake in SpeechNow v. FEC, our video competition to uncover it, and the legal strategy to render SuperPACs powerless. He also explores the power of Congress to limit campaign contributions, the flawed logic behind super PACs, and finding an alternative state to challenge current laws. Learn how to support the campaign through volunteering, financial contributions, and participating in a video competition.
Launching a video competition with a $50,000 prize to challenge the logical mistake behind the creation of super PACs and break the conventional wisdom that the First Amendment protects them.
Formulating a legal strategy involving an initiative in Maine to limit contributions to independent political action committees, aiming to trigger a Supreme Court challenge and overturn the mandate of super PACs.
Deep dives
Introduction of the video competition
The podcast episode introduces a video competition with a $50,000 prize. The competition aims to find a video that creatively explains the logical mistake behind the decision that led to the creation of super PACs. The background is provided, explaining that super PACs were not created by the Supreme Court's Citizens United decision, but rather by a lower federal court decision in March 2010. The episode emphasizes the importance of breaking the conventional wisdom that the First Amendment protects super PACs and launching this video competition to challenge that notion.
Strategy to overturn the decision on super PACs
The episode discusses the strategy to overturn the decision regarding super PACs. It explains the plan to file an initiative in Maine that would limit contributions to independent political action committees. By gathering signatures and getting the initiative on the ballot in November 2024, the hope is to trigger a legal challenge that would reach the first circuit and eventually the Supreme Court. The episode expresses optimism that the Supreme Court will recognize the mistake and decide that the Constitution does not mandate super PACs.
Call to action and support
The podcast episode encourages participation and support for the video competition and the initiative campaign. Listeners are urged to enter the video competition if they have the talent, or to share the competition with individuals who might be interested. Additionally, assistance is sought for the initiative campaign, including volunteering, gathering signatures, and providing financial support. The ultimate goal is to bring about change in campaign finance laws, starting with super PACs, in order to address the corrupting influence of money in politics.
In this episode, Lawrence Lessig outlines our plan to fight back against SuperPACs. He explains the logical mistake in SpeechNow v. FEC, why we launched a video competition (with a $50,000 prize!), and the legal strategy that could render SuperPACs largely powerless.
For more information on the video contest, visit:
cancelsuperpacs.com
Get the Snipd podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share & Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode