Morning Wire SCOTUS J6 Obstruction Arguments & NatCon Shutdown Efforts | 4.17.24
6 snips
Apr 17, 2024 The Supreme Court is diving into the controversial obstruction charges tied to the January 6th riot, raising questions about political dissent. Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg faces growing scrutiny over his prosecutorial choices, particularly in high-stakes cases. Meanwhile, a conservative event in Brussels encounters major hurdles, including venue cancellations and police actions amid threats from protestors. The discussion sheds light on the broader implications for free speech and the national conservatism movement in Europe.
AI Snips
Chapters
Transcript
Episode notes
SCOTUS J6 Obstruction Arguments
- The Supreme Court heard arguments on the use of obstruction charges for J6 defendants.
- This could impact hundreds of cases and even affect President Trump.
Arguments on Obstruction Charges
- The DOJ argues that "obstruction" applies broadly to those blocking official proceedings like the J6 electoral count.
- Republicans counter that this interpretation is too broad and could be used against political dissent.
Gorsuch's Protest Examples
- Justice Gorsuch questioned if the DOJ's logic would apply to other protests, like a sit-in or heckling.
- He referenced Congressman Jamal Bowman pulling a fire alarm to delay a vote, facing only a misdemeanor.