Breht O’Shea, host of Revolutionary Left Radio, and Alyson Escalante, co-host of Red Menace, dive into revolutionary strategy rooted in Lenin's pivotal questions. They debate the balance between spontaneous action and disciplined organization. The duo critiques economism, suggesting a broader political framework for leftist movements. They explore the historical context of reforms like the New Deal and underscore the necessity of a vanguard party. Their insights reveal why genuine change often stalls despite motivation, aiming to inspire a new understanding of systemic struggles.
01:54:41
forum Ask episode
web_stories AI Snips
view_agenda Chapters
menu_book Books
auto_awesome Transcript
info_circle Episode notes
insights INSIGHT
Economism Limits Socialist Struggle
Economism limits socialist struggle to economic demands like unions and reforms without challenging capitalism itself.
Lenin argues a revolutionary vanguard party is needed to address broader political and social issues beyond economics.
insights INSIGHT
Beyond Economic Struggles
Economic struggle is vital but insufficient on its own to achieve socialism.
Political and theoretical struggles must complement economic ones within a broader revolutionary framework.
question_answer ANECDOTE
Spontaneous Uprisings Lack Direction
The George Floyd uprisings showed massive spontaneous anger but lacked organized political direction.
Without a revolutionary party to guide them, such movements are often co-opted or dissipate without lasting change.
Get the Snipd Podcast app to discover more snips from this episode
Written in 1863 by Nikolai Chernyshevsky, 'What Is to Be Done?' is a novel that had a significant influence on Russian revolutionary thought. The story follows Viéra Pavlovna, a young woman who seeks economic independence and starts a cooperative workshop for seamstresses. The novel promotes the creation of small socialist cooperatives, advocates for women's rights, and critiques the patriarchal and authoritarian structures of Russian society. It was written in response to Ivan Turgenev's 'Fathers and Sons' and played a central role in polarizing the Russian intelligentsia between radical and liberal reformers. The novel's impact was so profound that it contributed to the conflicts leading up to the Russian Revolution[1][2][5].
The Wretched of the Earth
Frantz Fanon
Frantz Fanon's "The Wretched of the Earth" is a seminal work of postcolonial theory that explores the psychological and social effects of colonialism on colonized peoples. Fanon argues that colonialism creates a system of oppression that dehumanizes and alienates the colonized, leading to violence and resistance. He analyzes the role of violence in the struggle for liberation, emphasizing its necessity in breaking the cycle of oppression. The book also examines the process of decolonization, highlighting the need for a complete transformation of society and the creation of new forms of social and political organization. Fanon's work remains highly influential in discussions of colonialism, decolonization, and the ongoing struggle for racial and social justice.
Blood in my eye
George L. Jackson
George Jackson's 'Blood in My Eye' is a powerful and unflinching account of his experiences in the California prison system. Written while incarcerated, the book offers a searing critique of the prison-industrial complex and the systemic racism that permeates the U.S. justice system. Jackson details the brutal realities of prison life, including violence, oppression, and the dehumanization of prisoners. He also articulates a radical political vision, advocating for revolutionary change and the dismantling of oppressive systems. The book remains a crucial text for understanding the ongoing struggle for racial justice and prison reform.
What Is To Be Done? This is the question so profoundly posed by the Russian Revolutionary and Bolshevik leader, Vladimir Lenin, in his landmark text of the same name. Although it was written well over a century ago, this text, the questions it asked, and the paths forward that it provided, are just as relevant today as they were a hundred years ago. And just as urgent.
What roles do spontaneity and disciplined organization have in leftist movements? Can we focus simply on economic reform, or do our actions need a larger political framework to structure, guide, and propel them?
Why does it feel like even though so many of us are motivated to work towards structural change, that things continue to get worse? Why does it seem like potential revolutionary struggles in the West always seem to stall and fail to move from a singular moment to a protracted movement?
These are old and familiar questions — a lot of ink has been spilled and speeches made exploring them — and in this Conversation, we’ve brought on two guests who've not only thought about these questions in depth, but who have some pretty compelling answers that draw from revolutionary theory and practice in both their personal lives and from the deep well of wisdom bequeathed by theorists Marx, Engels, Lenin, and Mao.
Breht O’Shea is the host of the podcast Revolutionary Left Radio and a co-host of Guerrilla History. He’s been on the show multiple times so you may already be familiar with his voice. Alyson Escalate, who has also been on the show, is the co-host, along with Breht, of Red Menace, a podcast that explains and analyzes revolutionary theory and then applies its lessons to our contemporary conditions.
Rev Left Radio 
