

Episode 2: Dr. Judith Curry and Andrew Revkin
Jan 25, 2025
Dr. Judith Curry, a climate scientist known for her critical view of mainstream narratives, and Andrew Revkin, an environmental journalist focusing on solutions-driven reporting, engage in a thought-provoking discussion. They explore the complexities of climate science communication and the nuances of climate risk perception. Themes include the evolving role of journalism in climate discourse, the importance of transparency in scientific research, and the need for inclusive dialogue across differing perspectives. Their conversation advocates for a balanced understanding of climate change that encompasses various societal and environmental dimensions.
AI Snips
Chapters
Books
Transcript
Episode notes
IPCC's Narrow Climate Focus
- The IPCC was set up with a narrow mandate to find evidence of dangerous human-caused climate change.
- This framing and politicization has skewed climate science funding and focus toward alarmist views.
IPCC's Value and Challenges
- The IPCC process is valuable as a global scientific barometer but prone to distortion in messaging and political influence.
- Climate science is complicated by human factors and narrative capture, requiring nuanced journalism and broad perspectives.
Risk Over Climate Science
- Climate risk framing would better serve society than focusing narrowly on climate science alone.
- Risk involves exposure and vulnerability, often more important than the hazard itself.