Supreme Court Judgment and Its Implications

The Supreme Court recently addressed the status of Deliveroo riders concerning collective bargaining rights, a topic that has evolved since a 2017 application by the Independent Workers Union of Great Britain. The court ruled that Deliveroo riders did not qualify as workers due to their right of substitution, meaning they had the ability to assign their work to others. This finding effectively barred the riders from recognition for collective bargaining under existing legislation, marking a significant limitation for gig economy workers. The case not only highlighted the complexities surrounding worker classification in the gig economy but also showcased the court's stance on balancing worker rights with employer flexibility.