11KBW Employment Podcast
Deliveroo: Supreme Court on Worker Status and Article 11
Dec 12, 2023
Daniel Stilitz KC, a leading legal expert, delves into pivotal Supreme Court rulings on worker status affecting Deliveroo and other gig economy players. He explores the complexities of classifying employees versus 'LIMB' workers, shedding light on the implications for trade unions. The discussion also tackles the significance of Article 11 in relation to collective bargaining rights and the ongoing challenges faced by unions in the UK. With insights into flexibility in delivery work and historical legal frameworks, this conversation highlights the evolving landscape of worker rights.
27:27
Episode guests
AI Summary
AI Chapters
Episode notes
Podcast summary created with Snipd AI
Quick takeaways
- The Supreme Court's ruling highlighted that Deliveroo riders are not classified as workers, limiting their collective bargaining rights.
- Article 11 encompasses collective bargaining rights but does not impose a legal obligation to compel such agreements in the UK.
Deep dives
Supreme Court Judgment and Its Implications
The Supreme Court recently addressed the status of Deliveroo riders concerning collective bargaining rights, a topic that has evolved since a 2017 application by the Independent Workers Union of Great Britain. The court ruled that Deliveroo riders did not qualify as workers due to their right of substitution, meaning they had the ability to assign their work to others. This finding effectively barred the riders from recognition for collective bargaining under existing legislation, marking a significant limitation for gig economy workers. The case not only highlighted the complexities surrounding worker classification in the gig economy but also showcased the court's stance on balancing worker rights with employer flexibility.
Remember Everything You Learn from Podcasts
Save insights instantly, chat with episodes, and build lasting knowledge - all powered by AI.
